Why? Because I have a small post I wish share and perhaps others do as well. I also propose someone post periodic open threads, whether daily or weekly so we can chat and not worry about being on topic.
Why? Because I have a small post I wish share and perhaps others do as well. I also propose someone post periodic open threads, whether daily or weekly so we can chat and not worry about being on topic.
Help support the Forvm by buying items through our links. All proceeds go to defraying our hosting costs.
If you want to order computer equipment, please go to my business site.
You can now search comments by user. Check it out here. (Registered users only)
To search for users and specific text, use the search box at the top left of the front page.
Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference
Related Sites
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
Foreign Affairs
Politics
War
Economics and Business
Science and Tech
Legal
Sports
Film and Music
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
News and Aggregators
Dead Tree Media
References

Curt Weldon: Toast?
(#635)Link
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
He was my Congresscritter when I was in college
(#651)I sat in on talks by him a couple of times back in the day. He's a very strange dude, just odd.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Whaddya Mean,
(#667)this guy?
That's how it is on this bitch of an earth.
Yup, that'd be him. I voted for him once, but he lost
(#677)to Bob Edgar, then won after I graduated and moved the NYC.
He was the former mayor of "The Hook!" Marcus Hook PA, a serious hard-a** place to be mayor of. He played a role in running the Warlocks,a particualrly nasty motorcycle gang, out of town.
But like I said, just odd.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Since it's an open thread...
(#780)How'd you come up with this handle (if it's not your real name), and what was "SPC67" about? Just curious.
In the medical community, death is known as Chuck Norris Syndrome.
spc are my intials and 67 was my college football number
(#782)easy for the too frequently concussed "never weres" to remember :)
Glory days, they'll pass you by glory days, in the wink of a young girls eye, glory days
Jackson Mead is the mysterious bridgebuilder from Mark Helprin's Winter's Tale.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Open thread?
(#637)I'm going to bed, since it's midnight here in chilly Norway, and I've got two kids under 5 (well, the older one turns 5 tomorrow) who are going to wake me up at 7.
Nighty night everyone!
Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Good Idea
(#665)I have a couple of diary-level things I'd like to post, but will wait until that functionality is established. No reason to splash my stuff in everyone's face.
One thing, though, that caught my eye this past weekend is the legislation, signed by President Bush, that effectively outlaws internet gambling (by, it seems, rendering the underlying funds transfers, and related processing, illegal). I don't gamble much at all, and have never participated in internet gambling, but this just seems outrageous to me. I appreciate the purported rationale -- the protection of those, and they certainly exist, who are susceptible to gambling addiction -- but this is far, far too Nanny State for me. Yes, gambling carries dangers, and to participate in it responsibly requires a degree of self-discipline, which many do not have. That's life -- so do drinking, shopping, driving and all manner of other activities. But the proposition that we ought to prohibit this activity insofar as it occurs over the internet (at a time, for instance, when Indian and other brick-and-mortar casinos are sprouting up nearly everwhere), seems both illogical and to be an unwarranted intrusion into our private affairs.
That's how it is on this bitch of an earth.
In an ideal world
(#698)we could come up with some sort of national Do Not Gamble (or other vice) registry that people could voluntarily sign themselves up for (during a moment of strength); and then make it very difficult to get yourself off the list, requiring a notarized document, 7-day wait, etc. That way, people who know they have a problem could be prevented from participating without infringing on those who have a fully reflective & conscious desire to do so.
Just dreaming, I know.
The Enforcement,
(#707)of course, would be the responsibility of the casinos themselves, and, while I've read that some brick and mortar casinos actually maintain these sorts of programs, I can't imagine they're implemented with much rigor. At the end of the day, as with all things, I suspect it's about beating the devil on your own.
That's how it is on this bitch of an earth.
I didn't realize
(#709)that there were already such programs -- are the casinos that participate able to be sued or otherwise held responsible if they let someone through?
Anyway, as I said, I was just dreaming. I guess in a *truly* ideal world, we'd all be wise enough to not succumb to temptation in the first place.
That's Actually
(#710)how I heard about these things -- I read (I think it was in the NYT a while back) that some casino in Atlantic City let a guy in who previously had registered himself as a problem gambler and had asked to be barred. He blew a big load of money, then sued the casino for damages. I have no idea how it turned out, but I can't imagine that any casino would participate in something like this if there were even the slightest chance of liability. Of course, given the anonymity of most casinos, and the ability to just walk in and start gambling, I'm not sure how these sorts of programs could be effectively enforced anyway.
That's how it is on this bitch of an earth.
Good point
(#721)Until the day comes when credit/debit cards are required, I don't see how they could enforce it.
fwiw I just found this Overlawyered link suggesting that casinos are pretty clearly not on the hook for letting known problem gamblers gamble.
I would think that a credit card company would
(#727)or should be able to give you a higher rate or denied you a card if you are a gambler.... I am still upset with the bankruptcy bill on the grounds that it basically took the risk away from the credit card companies considering that they should not have handed out credit like candy... Like exempting drug dealers from paying taxes related to public health... (End rant):)
Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and yo
Open Thread Musical Interlude
(#704)The Mahavishnu Orchestra
~At times like these I am reminded of the immortal words of Socrates when he said...."I drank what?"
Worry about being on what now? -nt-
(#720)nt
M Aurelius was probably right.
A small
(#755)suggestion:
Could someone make the links red or orange or something that contrasts better than dark blue with the black type? It would make the site easier to read IMO.
Thanks for all the hard work you all put into this. I don't mean this as a gripe, just a suggestion.
I second that
(#802)and/or, in meantime, commenters please embolden your linkie-tags by wrapping them with the [b] [/6] thingies.
And this has probably already been mentioned, (aside from the apparent absence of a 'your comments' list and a permalink for comments, which i assume are in a state of becoming)
* but i have also noticed that there is no "parent" link underneath a comment to guide reader back to the comment it was replying to
* and number of comments/new comments tallies line disappears when you open up a diary into full mode (plus comments shown).
“It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.”--William Tecumseh Sherman
Yeah ...
(#770)... maybe we can use this as a comment location.
We need to make the 'recent diary posts' section bigger, so they don't scroll off so fast. (I know everyone's excited about the new site).
And we also need to implement some kind of selection to slow down the main page.
I know, I know, it's only been one day. But I'm already getting whiplash from the scroll.
I don't want to go back to the old story submission queue. Just some kind of automatic mechanism for sorting or promoting/demoting stories up from the diary section. Or just restrict whoch ones are included on the front, and which ones just have the link on the sidebar.
I figured out
(#837)how to do the "Recent Diaries" like the old site, just waiting for WetherMan to give me the go ahead to upload it.
As far as the story submission -> vote -> front page process, post something in the suggestion diary. I think MA is pretty set on it.
I blame it all on the Internet
Fun With Numbers!
(#783)Shall we all do The Countdown
together?Do I have nine months
(#788)to get my wife with child and attempt to father number 300,000,000 or will that event happen sooner?
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
Hey...
(#789)I'm a believer in whatever line gets the job done :-)
But no...this is gonna happen really soon.
By Between. . .
(#795). . .5 and 6 AM PDT tomorrow, as far as my admittedly rusty math skills can determine.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Sounds about right.
(#800)As we mull this over, little number 300 million is presently making his or her mom fairly uncomfortable.
Frodo failed -- Bush has the Ring of Power
(#785)Link for merchandize.
This is a terrific meme for Democrats to spread amongst the Christian Right. Bush and supporters such as Dr. Dobson may have started out with good Christian intentions however the allure of Beltway power overcame them all.
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
Any NFL Fans. . .
(#792). . .who don't have Monday Night Football on might want to turn it on--this game could end up as one of the biggest upsets of the last decade. As much as this old Bruin hates to admit it, Leinart's got game.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Try my lifetime
(#797)I literally am having a hard time believing what I'm seeing. I was expecting da Bearssss by 30 - 40 points at halftime.
Any bets that the '72 Dolphins will be drinking champagne next Sunday?
I blame it all on the Internet
bets
(#824)I'd bet my life savings that the '72 Dolphins will most certainly NOT be celebrating a Bears loss next Sunday.
Mostly because next week is a bye week for the Bears.
Pay up, please.
I was alluding
(#826)to the Indy-Patriots game, but I misread the schedule, it's not for another 3 weeks. You win about Da Bearsss having a bye. Here's your winnings: LINK
I blame it all on the Internet
oh yes
(#829)I forgot that the Colts are also undefeated. In that case, it is only a matter of time until they record their first loss.
I have never won something so amazing in my life. I thank you, good sir.
Not yet, the Cards can't administer the coup de grace
(#805)That's an acquired skill too. But Leinart is already better than I thought he'd be EVER.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
90 seconds later I'm proven an idiot...again <nt>
(#807)xxx
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Uh, no
(#811)can you say enough about Urlacher?
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
Someday Butkus will be considered the second best
(#812)Bear Middle Linebacker ever to play.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Can't go there
(#815)Urlacher's good, but that's a negatory.
You may be right
(#817)but Urlacher is going to give it his best shot.
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
My memories of Butkus
(#819)may not be fully accurate, because god-like would be the adjective I would choose. A mean, burly brawler of a god. When I think of Butkus I think of him tracking running plays running laterally along the line of scrimmage, knocking offensive lineman aside like ten-pins without even slowing down, then grabbing the running back with one outstretched hand and slinging him down--or maybe picking him up and biting his arm off.
He played for a terrible team--that all offensive players feared to play against.
One good point, Butkus was HUGE for his time
(#822)He was as big as a typical offensive tackle with a playing weight around 245. The equivalent today would be if Urlacher weighed 325. But Butkus' defenses weren't bad, the Bears O was.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
I will say
(#834)that I rate players according to how they fared among the players of their era. Obviously, everybody is bigger and faster now--but if Butkus were 25 now he would've been eating the same wonder proteins and doing the same wonder workouts as everybody else and I think the results would be roughly the same.
It turns out that he was a college player and a really really good one when I first became a big football fan, so I remember his NFL career right well. It says right here that Butkus was the most dominant defensive player to ever strap 'em on--at least since about 1962 when I started following the game--and that it's not even particularly close.
If anybody playing today has a shot at Zeus, it's Julius Peppers. Urlacher's good, maybe the best LB in the league, but he ain't there, and he's a 7-year vet so there's no real reason to think it's gonna happen at some time in the future. Peppers ain't there yet, either, but he is playing at a level so far this year that he hasn't shown before, so I wouldn't rule him out.
Butkus the most dominant ever?
(#1098)Not even close. He never changed the game the way Lawrence Taylor did. Before Taylor, running backs blocked blitzing linebackers. After Taylor? Left tackles became the second most highly paid position on the field trailing only QB's. Why? Because Taylor, and those who followed, could wreck not just a play, not just a game, but your whole season.
Ask Bill Walsh or read the new Michael Lewis book Blind Side.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Someday I said
(#818)He's unbelievably quick, as was Butkus for his day but not to this degree, a vastly superior guy in pass coverage, and is already more durable than Butkus was.
Urlacher isn't as flagrantly nasty, but he certainly can control a game in the same manner as Butkus did.
If he lasts 5 more years at this level? He'll have doubled Butkus productivity. Butkus played on one leg for the second half of his career.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Big play by Mark Anderson
(#809)The top two defensive rookies in the NFL, hands down, are from Alabama.
Mark Anderson is 2nd in the league in sacks with 6.5.
Demeco Ryans is 3rd in the league in solo tackles even though his team, the Texans, has already had a bye and the only guys ahead of him have not had bye weeks.
A 3rd rookie from Bama, Roman Harper, started at strong safety for the Saints until he went down for the season with a knee injury after last week's game. Harper had 27 tackles in the 5 games he played in and was getting a rep as the Saints' head-hunter.
Brian Urlacher
(#813)strips the ball. How many turnovers?
5:00 minutes to go.
10 Lets Go Bears!
20 GOTO 10
Run
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
Rex Grossman had me worried
(#816)So, I guess we needed a punt return. Yes!
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
Was it just me
(#1131)Or was that most inexplicable game in a long time?
“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”
Winning, or perhaps more specifically
(#1136)stepping on an opponents throat to finish them really is an acquired skill like any other, at least in football. The Coach of the team which is ahead by a large margin at any time, but particularly in the second half and most obviously in te fourth quarter, has to call plays designed to run the clock, which is more important than gaining yards and must max protect the quarterback so as to prevent turnovers, quarterbacks and running backs need to understand that the extra yard or the completion isn't worth the risk of the fumble or of taking too long in the pocket, the quarterback must not call for the snap until the play clock runs down to two, ball carriers and receivers must always stay in bounds and the offensive line must thrive on pounding the front seven of the defense. Maybe most importantly, the emotional intensity must remain at fever pitch. Once that leaves it is almost impossible to recapture.
On defense it is more simple, keep everything in front of you, keep ball carriers in bounds and work the clock.
Do all those things and you'll win, do most of them and you'll usually win, do few of them and catch a few bad breaks? Bears 24-Cards 23.
Denny Green was a disgrace with his play calling.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Lienart deserved better
(#821)6 turnovers? Grand larceny by the Bears.
But a "Win" nonetheless.
The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.
I Almost Wept fo Lienart Tonight...
(#830)...but he took it like a man. I watched the after game interviews and he was a brick...no flinching, still supporting his team, personally took the blame for the blind-side tackle and fumble.
And he sounded smart...which of course he is.
Let me be brutal here...some of these guys in the interviews are painful to even listen to, they can't put together a sentence, it is embarrassing.
Say what you want about Matt, I'm on his side...and I liked the way Kurt Warner behaved on the sidelines in support also.
Two stand-up guys.
Best Wishes,
Traveller
Yeah, I'm gonna be really wrong about Leinart
(#1100)And I should know better, his 4th and 9 audible in the waning minutes at Notre Dame was the most courageous call I've sever seen in a college game and the touch on the pass that made it work was exquisite.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Rachel Corrie is back
(#866)“My Name is Rachel Corrie” is now playing in some small Greenwich Village theatre. Based upon her writings the audience is subjected to her earnest views on world hunger, spotted owls, salmon, helping the homeless, Middle East peace, and the fundamental goodness of human nature. Had she stuck to advocating for fish and birds, and not instead thrown away life on behalf of a people who want anything but peace, she’d be able to tell us her views on these things herself, but that is beside the point I guess.
"We should not tie the hands of law enforcement in the effort to bring these terrorists to justice"- Leon E. Panetta
I had always kinda hoped...
(#1001)...that she would be held up as an example by the other side of the kinds of resistance which they would respect. That might have given her a legacy, a way that the conflict could move from violence to nonviolence to some kind of reconciliation.
My conclusion is that neither side wants peace, really. The costs are too high.
"In the very long run, we are all dead." -- John Maynard Keynes, 1st Baron Keynes
Everybody's Right!
(#892)Or so sez Klosterman.
“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco
Photo Caption Contest!!
(#933)The Prez convenes the Super Best Friends League for a little face time. (Mike Gallagher, Neal Boortz, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved.)
Captions please.
“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco
Oops, Forget the Superest Super Best Friend of them All
(#937)Barney, of course.
“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco
Leave the dogs out of this! Pick on Hannity etc. all you want
(#1134)xxx
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
So
(#945)I called this Tikriti or Malooki fella over there yesterday, and I looked him right in the eye and said, "Stretch, those bombs and whatnot are just unacceptable, and we're gonna hang with 'ya."
That's how it is on this bitch of an earth.
Now you guys
(#972)(and gal, Laura, heh heh) talk on the radio. You're radio talkers! Now I had some of them internet guys in here last week, but they use too many big words. Don't like that. When you guys talk, you get the juices flowing. We need that. We need that ol' Democracy juice flowing everywhere if we're gonna get them Iraqis to do what we tell 'em. So keep up the good work! I bet Bill Clinton never invited you guys in here. Hey, you wanna see Saddam's gun?
I blame it all on the Internet
Not bad.
(#974)Could use a few more heh, heh's though.
Oh...and more sibilance. Much more sibilance. That's how you know he's bein' seriousss about the isssuesss.
Democracy juice! -nt-
(#979).
M Aurelius was probably right.
And there was this Chancellor chick like, ka-Pow!
(#1166)(The story we definitely won't be hearing about in tomorrow's traffic jam.)
M Aurelius was probably right.
Dear Google:
(#1151)I think we should see other people!
I've seen the future brother, and it's buxom. -nt-
(#1165).
M Aurelius was probably right.
hey Ken hear about Field Manual 3-24 yet?
(#1256)http://www.nypost.com/seven/10182006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/politically_correct_war_opedcolumnists_ralph_peters.htm from this it doesn't sound good granted its from a reporter with his own bias but not being hard enough(letting Sadr go repeatly due to political reasons after fighting us)is what got us here in the first place.they should have just updated this http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/swm/index.htm
light infantry...why ride when you can walk,why hide when you can fight.
Yeah, the kid got hold of an advance copy sent to
(#1318)Bragg; he wasn't impressed. Doesn't surprise me, the Army's as PC as the New York Times. Unfortunately.
I think based on what I know and have heard that Peters has it about right, good effort but too PC. Another example of Ken's infamous pendulum -- the Army went too far into the "Big War" routine and in the effort to correct that with this FM, overswung too far into the small war dogma. It'll get sorted in a few years and get about right.
The good news it that, in the interim, the kids on the ground will work it out; they always do.
The K Codes explained HERE.
Interesting new Newsweek poll
(#2659)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15357623/site/newsweek/page/2/
Asks several questions about priorities for a possible Democratic Congress. On one of the questions, 28% of Americans think that impeaching Bush should be a high priority for the Congress, 23% think it should be a low priority, and 44% think that it shouldn't be done. Hmmm. I think 28 + 23 is actually > 44!
Also of interest: overwhelming majorities favor (by greater than 3-1 in each case) Congressional investigations of government contracts in Iraq and of why we went to war in Iraq.
On a side note, how dumb do you have to be to think that the Congress should impeach the President but only if they get around to it, as apparently 23% do? Never underestimate the stupidity of the stupid.
Do you think it would help
(#2992)Democratic chances in '08 if they spend a lot of time investigating "handling of port security and the threat of nuclear smuggling; computer privacy; climate change; concentration of media ownership; the new Medicare Part D program,[...] the secret meetings of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force. [...] Halliburton and alleged rip-offs and contract abuse in Iraq [...] the Bush tax cuts [...] the Patriot Act and domestic wiretapping" plus impeachment? If not, would they still do it?
Investigaton suggestions from this article. More on that in this diary.