Update: NRO's Kathleen Parker & Kathryn Lopez re: Palin

3

Kathleen Parker here and Kathryn Jean Lopez (Free Sarah Palin!) after the break:

Some of the passionately feminist critics of Palin who attacked her personally deserved some of the backlash they received. But circumstances have changed since Palin was introduced as just a hockey mom with lipstick — what a difference a financial crisis makes — and a more complicated picture has emerged.

* * *


Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.

* * *

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

Funny thing, the above was my FIRST impression of Sarah Palin.

NRO editor Kathryn Jean Lopez responds:

I don’t know Sarah Palin. Having missed the last cruise to Alaska, I’ve actually never met her. National Review wasn’t on her list of stops this week in New York. So I can’t pretend to know what her wiring is all about. But I know I like a lot of what I’ve heard her say. I also know a lot of what I like about her could be projection. I’m not where my friend Kathleen Parker is — wanting her to step aside to spend more time with her family and Alaska — but that’s not a crazy suggestion. She's right to say that something’s gotta change.

My guess — based on nothing but hope for a change — is that Sarah Palin just needs some freedom. I don’t know who is holding her back but if John McCain wants to win this thing it had better not be him and his staff.

Of note: Bird Dog says Palin ain't cutting it. Kathryn Jean Lopez suggests McCain's staff is at fault, here.

Back to K-Lo:

If Sarah Palin is John McCain’s secret weapon, let her go, whoever is holding her back. And, frankly, if it turns out that the “authentic” Palin of rallies and the Republican convention is just good speech delivery in a woman with some good spirit, I want to know that sooner rather than later. (Mitt’s still available. Someone in Washington who can actually run a business and knows something about the economy will come in handy once the federal government owns the U.S. banking system.) But if the Palin we know and love and have projected our hopes for sanity in American politics is the real Sarah Palin — then come out from the shadows, woman. You’re the one who is going to win this election. Be yourself. Otherwise, what’s the point?

Palin versus Biden next week would be a great place to start.

Mitt Romney? Now? That would be a "between the devil and the deep blue sea" choice for McCain.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Delusionary

(#123930)

"But if the Palin we know and love and have projected our hopes for sanity in American politics is the real Sarah Palin..."

..the Palin we know and love...

How? They admit they've not even met her - what is this? Celebrity crush time?

"...have projected our hopes..."

Yes, "projections" all right - at IMAX levels!

"...for sanity in American politics..."

"Sanity"?

And righties love to snark that it's Obama backers who have a "messiah" fixation?

I second the motion: "Free Sarah Palin"

(#123937)

Let America meet the real Sarah Palin!

Let Palin be Palin!

The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.

Parker might as well say that...

(#123896)

...she wants McCain to lose. It's easy to find plenty of quotes from conservatives and GOPers who are critical of McCain, and it doesn't take much for them to hit their tipping points. Many have hated him since 2000.


"I think BDog would make this place interesting." --catchy

Ha

(#123898)

on CNN yesterday, they were talking about how McCain could pull the Rs and Ds together for a compromise. Ed Rollins said (paraphrase) McCain can get the Ds, that's what he always does. It's getting the Rs that he can't do, because most of them don't trust him.

However, I wonder how many will actually run against him in their home districts?

I blame it all on the Internet

Look At It This Way

(#123966)

McCain was probably lying to his fellow Republicans before he was lying to the rest of us. That they don't trust him should not come as a surprise.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

I pray

(#123863)

I pray that she is too stupid to realize that she ought to step aside.

Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. -Mark Twain

It's way too late for that

(#123888)

Dumping your VP pick at this point is a flip flop of biblical proportions. Even the most savvy candidate would have trouble getting back off the canvas after a move like that.

Not to mention that the Palin pick did do something. It energized the Christianist Right. If he tries to throw her under the bus to save his campaign, they'll be in full-scale revolt.

I'd also like to mention that I totally predicted this. When everyone was saying what a brilliant pick this was and how she's going do all these great things for the McCain campaign, I was saying that once people realized what a lightweight she was, she's pull his campaign to the bottom like a set of cement shoes. Sarah "cement shoes" Palin. That's her.

Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven.

James Fallows & Ross Douhut on Palin

(#123809)

Fallows:

I've now seen much of the Katie Couric / Sarah Palin interview...

... and I genuinely feel sorry for Palin. This really is pathetic. Again it's not a mass/elite matter. Anyone who has been to high school immediately recognizes the terror of facing a pop quiz or an oral exam when you just have no idea what you're talking about.

Ross Douthat (28 August 2008):

For a few months now, I've inclined toward Sarah Palin as a gamble worth taking: She's a charming unknown with a great story, both politically and personally, and the potential upside of having the media fawn all over her for a week or two might outweigh the risk that she undercuts McCain's experience narrative and/or gets carved up by Biden in a veep debate. (Especially since I suspect Biden is more likely to come off as an obnoxious bully if he's up against a likable woman.)

Ross Douthat (25 September 2008):

Sarah the Unready

And now, an excerpt from my inner monologue, as transcribed while watching various clips from Sarah Palin's interview with Katie Couric (I can't link to them; they're too painful):

The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.

Crunchy Con - Rod Dreher

(#123794)

Link

I suspect the truth is that Palin simply didn't have the intellectual curiosity to travel abroad and learn from other cultures. That's not a sin, but it is to be regretted in someone who puts herself forward as a leader of the world's pre-eminent power. What is a sin, or at least a mark against her character, is to frame one's disinterest in the world beyond the border of one's experience as a sign of populist virtue.

The proper balance between defense and welfare are the tectonic plates that lie beneath our political discourse.