Palin Clearinghouse II


Sequels aren't always bad!

And in this case the original worked well. Aggregating Palin info. in one place makes it easier to follow and then the diary sidebar isn't just about the VP pick.

Personally I like talking about Palin as well and am interested to see what new stuff comes forth as people keep digging into her past.

Leave it below!
--

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
You can't get much more pro-woman than this (#118213)
by Chuchundra

From The Frontiersman - May 22, 2000

Gov. Tony Knowles recently signed legislation protecting victims of sexual assault from being billed for tests to collect evidence of the crime, but one local police chief said the new law will further burden taxpayers.

...

While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests.

Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.

...

According to Fannon, the new law will cost the Wasilla Police Department approximately $5,000 to $14,000 a year to collect evidence for sexual assault cases.

Palin spent Fifteen million bucks for a new hockey rink/sports complex, but couldn't spare a thousandth of that cost to aid in prosecuting rapists.

--

Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven.

Th police chief expected (#118287)
by Spartacvs

1 rape a month in a small town of 5,500?

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

Yeah, that's pretty amazing. (#118348)
by Punditus Maximus

something like 5x the national average.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Small town values (#118356)
by Spartacvs

If you get raped or assaulted then it's probably partly your fault, so you can pay for the rape kit/examination.

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

They laughed when Zogby sat down to play the piano. (#117659)
by tomsyl

Specially for Blue Neponset and Harley to analyze:

Gallup poll shows McCain/Palin ahead by three points.

Rasmussen: Tie.

CBS: tie.

Zogby: Palin helps McCain to approach fifty percent of vote.

RCP poll average: Obama ahead by 0.8 points.

Guys, your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to explain why all of these polls are meaningless and Obama's still ahead by a comfortable margin.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

Zogby still sucks!!! (#117904)
by Blue Neponset

National polls aren't that meaningful. State by state polls are where the action is, and that is where Obama is ahead comfortably. (see the poll links Hank provided in the left hand colum)

If McCain pulls even in Iowa, New Mexico, Michigan or takes a big lead in Colorado, Ohio, Florida or Virginia then I will start to worry. Until then I am going to try not to worry too much about national polls.

--

But she's a queen, and such are queens
that your laughter is sucked in their brains. -D. Bowie

Me? (#117683)
by Gabriel

I don't think he is comfortably ahead.

I still think Obama is the favorite, though.

--

This place is my vacation.

Funny (#117675)
by HankP

how you only mention polls that have good news for McCain. Why would that be, I wonder?

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Put up some maimstream polls with Obama leading (#117681)
by tomsyl

if you can, Hank. The polls I linked to are those that have been tracked and averaged by RCP for many months; the outlier poll from is linked there, too; It's from "diageo/The Hotline", whatever that is, and didn't even begin polling until Sept. 2.But if you want to run with that one, be my guest.

I linked to Zogby (which RCP doesn't track) as a special for BN and Harley.

You are trying to shrug off numbers by the big-time pollsters that show Obama as tied with or behind McCain. Are you somehow trying to claim that you are fair and balanced, and I'm not?

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

I'm not worried (#117673)
by heet

The state by state count still looks rock solid for Obama. He's got lots of cash for the swing state media buys, things will be fine.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

Agreed (#117677)
by Harley

Also big advantages in both new voter registration and a far superior ground game (GOTV), the kind that the GOP benefited from in the last two elections.

Tho' I don't trust the new voter numbers completely. It feels like a subset of assuming a massive increase in young voters is going to put the Dems over the top. Which, at this point, feels like an urban legend we're teased with every four years.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

we'll see (#117684)
by heet

the next few weeks are crucial. If McCain moves substantially in the swing states, he'll have a chance.

The political markets seem to think this is a possibility. He's gone up a bit in the last day. I still think Obama is in great shape, though.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

Rasmussen breaks down voters by age (#117682)
by tomsyl

and their numbers to a degree support the belief that younger people are more likely to go for Obama. The site has lots of other interesting breakdowns. (No numbers on voting patterns of ex-POWs though.)

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

McCain's speech at the convention, (#117672)
by Spartacvs

his command of the issues that voters feel are important and the policies he outlined to deal with the country's various problems, obviously resonated well with the American public.

What else?

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

No Problem! (#117669)
by Harley

I've been trying to talk polls with you seriously for a couple weeks now. Even gave you a good resource in this regard. And while your comment suggests you'd rather do standup, I'll give it a shot.

These polls were expected -- by me, at least -- and it's too soon to know if this is the extent of McCain's convention bounce, or if there is more to come.

First, forget Zogby. Nearly everybody, including Nate Silver, does.

Second, Nate Silver puts it better than I can:

Still, we just don't know in what direction the polls are going to move from here forward. There just isn't any precedent for so many political molecules being packed into such a tight space, with the conventions and VP selections having come right on top of one another. If one assumes that the Republicans are getting a typical 6 or 7-point convention bounce, that suggests that the race still probably leans by a a couple of points to Barack Obama once the polls return to equilibrium, the current numbers representing some sort of short-lived, dead cat bounce along the lines of what happened to Walter Mondale in 1984. If, on the other hand, one assumes that both parties have had their say and that these polls already represent the new equilibrium, things are looking up for McCain-Palin. The truth, of course, is most likely somewhere in between. Our tracking graph still regards Barack Obama as roughly a 3-point favorite, but it is designed to respond cautiously to new information. If McCain sustains these numbers over the course of the next week or so, it will shift toward him relatively rapidly.

So it's foolish to either panic or crow about these numbers. Given some of these polls are rolling three day numbers, there's a possibility that McCain will do even better in the next few days.

But as to the Republican bounce? The true test will be how it holds up when other political events occur -- just as the GOP convention 'occurred' to the Obama bounce. A gaffe, a foreign policy event, more bad economic news, an endorsement (Colin Powell comes to mind), a disastrous interview for Gov. Palin. If it weathers whatever storm comes next? Then there might be reason for the Dems to worry about the McCain/Palin juggernaut.

And needless to say, we need to see how much the state polls reflect the national ones. I'd assume, for example, that Obama will lose the lead he recently picked up in Ohio. If he doesn't? That would be bad news for McCain.

But again, it's early, the landscape is almost entirely unpredictable. Though one thing remains the same. Obama enjoys huge structural advantages -- the kind that propelled Reagan to a landslide, but ONLY after his performance in the debates.

So, as is often the case. The debates are going to be very, very important.

Needless to say, I've never suggested polls are meaningless when they cut against Obama. Nor have I suggested Obama is ahead when he's not. So next time you want my opinion on polling matters?

Ask me like an grownup would ask me or I won't waste time schooling you.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Sarah Speaks! (#117646)
by Harley

Well it only took two days of gentle ribbing from Obama and Biden for the McCain campaign to reverse field and announce Sarah's first sit-down with a reporter.

Under pressure for being shielded for questioning, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) has a agreed to sit down with Charles Gibson of ABC's "World News Tonight," according to an ABC News official. No other interviews are scheduled.

It will be the first TV interview for Palin since she was named 10 days ago as running mate to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

It should be interesting. Gibson was happy enough to chase down every possible rumor and turn it into a question for Obama in the Pennsylvania debates. On the other hand, he got scorched in the aftermath and was left off the Prez Debate moderator roster.

I have no idea how he'll approach the Barracuda.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

I have a long list of things Obama did reactively (#117656)
by tomsyl

including his trip to Iraq by way of Fermany. Shall we compare, with you conceding the point that the Iraq sojourn was due to "ribbing from the McCain camp?"

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

Not Sure (#117671)
by Harley

I can't imagine the Obama campaign hadn't discussed an Iraq visit internally. Pressure from the McCain camp may have pushed that along. And I don't know where 'Fermany' is.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Fermany is next to Grance (#117687)
by BlaiseP

Check out the McCain map of the world.

-for entertainment purposes only. Obviously F is next to G on the keyboard, and it's an understandable mistake. My own tortured grammar is sinful.

My Frammer's Not So Hot Either. nt (#117694)
by Harley

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Ooops (#117593)
by M Scott Eiland
this proves what, exactly? (#117594)
by heet

That Obama's campaign can delete the blog post of a nobody website contributor? The internet has rumors circulating on it?

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

At Fivethirtyeight.com Sean Quinn has the best analogy so far... (#117566)
by Davinci

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-not-hockey-mom.htm...

Something that everyone should keep in mind.... :)

--

Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and your

McCain advisor admits Palin not ready (#117509)
by HankP

LINK

Todd Harris, GOP strategist who is close to the McCain campaign, says Palin won't be available to the press for about two weeks. His defense? She might make "a mistake."

If she goes out and makes a mistake, that is something that [voters will] care about, and that's something that will haunt [McCain] for awhile, so I think this is a smart move.


Just too funny. My friends, that's change you can believe in.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

That Should Be Fun On January 20th (#117520)
by M Scott Eiland

"Waaaaaaah! It's not *fair*! She didn't meet with the media for *two weeks*!"

--

It won't be fun (#117570)
by Blue Neponset

Palin should have started her VP course three weeks ago. The fact that she didn't reflects poorly on McCain.

If Angry John and Sarah Probert are elected it will be a sad day for our country.

--

But she's a queen, and such are queens
that your laughter is sucked in their brains. -D. Bowie

Yes, I'm sure that there will be much whining... (#117530)
by Chuchundra

...on the day that Obama is inaugurated. That's certainly going to be a lot of fun for me.

--

Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven.

You sure you want on this crazy train? (#117526)
by HankP

I never thought you were one to praise incompetence and lack of experience.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

It's totally fair (#117523)
by catchy

anyone who can garner qualifications for POTUS in two short weeks deserves the job.

That's ridiculous (#117519)
by catchy

It's going to be a marathon 2 weeks. Waking up to staring at a map of the world on the ceiling and then memorizing the cabinet positions.

I'd love to see if she could name all 12 members of the President's cabinet. There're only 10? Oh well, at least William Hurt would understand.

Seriously if I was a journalist + had the opportunity to ask her a question I'd ask:

Where's Abqaiq?

I highly doubt Palin has any idea. She did however presume to lecture nearly 40 million Americans on the danger that:

terrorists might strike again at the Abqaiq facility in Saudi Arabia

I hope she learns enough over the next two weeks to be our president.

I recall rumors that Duba wore an earpiece (#117529)
by Bill White

during his debates.

Give Palin an ear piece and link her to some smart people with wireless web access.

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Not that question (#117528)
by HankP

then you're picking on her because she's a girl!

No, I think the standard questions will do just fine. She'll just answer with talking points, but that matches the top of the Republican ticket so no one will notice.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

When is Sarah Palin going to be on Oprah? (#117506)
by Chuchundra

This seems to be the current GOP talking point making it's way across the blogosphere. The Repubs are all up in arms because Palin isn't going to get a touchy-feely interview sitting on Ms. Winfrey's couch.

Do they really think this argument is getting them anything except ridicule?

More importantly, when is Governor Palin going to be on Meet The Press? When is she going to sit down with reporters and answer questions? How can she claim to be ready to be a heartbeat away from the presidency if she can't be trusted to talk to the press on her own.

--

Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven.

What If It Turns Out She's Stupid? (#117497)
by Harley

The McCain campaign has no idea. Tho' they may have a better idea now. As opposed to when they selected her.

This is fun:

The biggest project that Sarah Palin undertook as mayor of this small town was an indoor sports complex, where locals played hockey, soccer, and basketball, especially during the long, dark Alaskan winters.

The only catch was that the city began building roads and installing utilities for the project before it had unchallenged title to the land. The misstep led to years of litigation and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for a small municipality with a small budget. What was to be Ms. Palin's legacy has turned into a financial mess that continues to plague Wasilla.

There's a very thin line between newly minted rock star and national joke. We'll see which side of the divide she falls on. I'm guessing joke.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

She's Not a Hockey Mom, She's a Hockey Agitator (#117485)
by Harley

Sean's got a great post up over at fivethirtyeight.

And then several years ago I had an epiphany about the hockey playoffs – nobody is coming to save you. Initiators win, reactors lose. Expect adversity, because it's built in. The fourth-line, no-scoring-talent, pest agitators (or as we now call them, “energy guys”) have a specific job. Skate in, take a cheap shot, make it after the whistle. Make it against the rules. Stir something up. Put a wet glove in the other guy's face and rub it. Get the outrage flowing. Get the opponent not thinking about the game, get them thinking about your shenanigans. And what happens? The “victimized” team loses its composure, hitting back. The guy who hits second is always the guy who goes to the penalty box.

And...

Sarah Palin is a person who by her own admission found out about the Iraq surge – the centerpiece of the McCain judgment argument – from television. Apologies to conservatives, but technically, objectively, inarguably, this alone makes her unqualified to be President. But we don’t live in that technical or objective world. Political campaigns – as distinct from policy and governance – are the NHL playoffs. It’s only about who survives the war of attrition to the finish line first. Is Brett Hull’s skate still in Dominik Hasek’s crease and was that same situation disallowed in every previous instance throughout that season? Yes, but so what? Dallas had a parade.

In the hockey analogy, Palin wouldn’t get within a thousand miles of an NHL All-Star Game because she’s not a scoring talent. She’s a role player, an emotion-rouser. Emotion messes with the chalkboard-drawn game plan and thus achieves a specific strategic objective. She can make game-changing agitation plays that rouse her home team and provoke the other side into counterattacks that – 100% of the time – end up punishing the team who hits back. Democrats would be smart to understand her as such, and I see a lot of reaction that doesn't seem to grasp what Palin is doing and the value she's providing. I see a lot of Democrats taking a lot of bait.

The real question it, how do you handle a pest like this?

This applies more to Democratic surrogates than it does to the top-ticket duo. Joe Biden had the smart response yesterday – naming the behavior – expecting it, and then riding through without taking the bait:

“It was about how well placed -- and boy she is good -- how a left jab can be stuck pretty nice. It’s about how Barack Obama is such a bad guy.”

And that’s all he says of Palin’s antics. Name the behavior, even praising the skill with which the agitation was attempted, and then back to focus. It's "the economy, stupid."

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Uh oh! Here comes the other shoe. (#117455)
by BlaiseP

From Andrew Sullivan.

Todd Palin's former business partner files an emergency motion to have his divorce papers sealed. Oh God.

More Like Andy. . . (#117459)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .slipping on a banana peel. Gotta keep up, Blaise--I posted this link last night.

--

I am not buying this boudin, mister. (#117465)
by BlaiseP

We don't know what's in those records. One thing seems certain, those dogs over at Enquirer have dug up something foul and nasty. Lord knows what it is, a skull? A femur?

John Edwards made all these same noises, just before the end. First as tragedy then as farce, they say. There's plenty of smoke. Let's see if there's fire.

Actually, Yes We Do (#117595)
by M Scott Eiland
Gosh, so this proves the Enquirer was all wrong? (#117603)
by BlaiseP

I don't see anyone denying Palin had the affair. I don't see the actual paperwork anywhere, but this I do know, I have heard all these noises before.

From John Edwards.

IS the "divorce paper" guy (#117612)
by athenas owl

the former business partner they're talking about anyway?

They've had more than one former business partner..

It Proves. . . (#117607)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .the "they must be hiding something in those divorce papers!" meme is false--and there's absolutely nothing left after that's been eliminated that approaches what was there in the Edwards case. First Rule Of Holes, Blaise.

--

Since this was buried (#117330)
by HankP

in another thread, I'll re-post it since it contains links to actual sources discussing Palin's lies on the whole trooper issue:

On 7/19 -

Monegan said phone calls and questions from the Palin administration and the governor's husband, Todd Palin, about trooper Mike Wooten started shortly after Monegan was hired and continued up to one or two months ago.

The governor herself also had a brief conversation with him about Wooten in February, Monegan said.

The new assertions from Monegan, who has been mostly silent on his abrupt firing July 11, conflict with what the Republican governor said earlier in the week. She said she never put pressure on the commissioner to fire her sister's ex-husband and no one from her office had complained about Wooten. She has also said replacing Monegan with Kenai Police Chief Chuck Kopp had nothing to do with Wooten. She has offered little explanation for the dismissal.

... but please, do read the entire thing. It clearly states that Palin denied any contact and includes a lot of her aides and associates conveniently not recalling anything.

Then, of course, it turned out that there were recordings in which Frank Bailey, Palin's director of boards and commissions was recorded -

"The Palins can't figure out why nothing's going on," Bailey said in the recorded phone call. "So Todd and Sarah are scratching their heads saying 'Why is this guy representing the department, he's a horrible recruiting tool.' You know? So from their perspective everybody's protecting him. . .

Despite the content of the recordings, Palin said that Bailey acted on his own.

Finally, Monegan released emails sent by Palin and others to him that harshly criticized Alaska state troopers for failing to fire her former brother-in-law -

"This trooper is still out on the street, in fact he's been promoted," said a Feb. 7, 2007, e-mail sent from Palin's personal Yahoo account and written to give Monegan permission to speak on a violent-crime bill before the state legislature.

"It was a joke, the whole year long 'investigation' of him," the e-mail said. "This is the same trooper who's out there today telling people the new administration is going to destroy the trooper organization, and that he'd 'never work for that b****', Palin'.)"

So who should we believe, Monegan who's been backed up by every piece of evidence that's been produced, or Palin who's lied and retracted her statements every step of the way?

--

I blame it all on the Internet

No offense, HankP (#117341)
by Elagabalus

but I would let TMZ and NE handle this one!

--

I had discovered a great secret. That everyone loves themselves more than they love anybody else. And if I wanted them to love me, I better be like THEM!... Ken Nordine

Cuz They were Great on Whitewater? (#117447)
by Harley

I'm a little confused. This is a scandal that goes directly to governance and a possible abuse of power. Since when is that the more appropriate provenance of the tabloids?

Unless you were making a joke. In which case. Ha. Ha.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

There's plenty of celebrity mocking to be had (#117481)
by dionysus

We can trust that they'll do a lot of it without having to even get our hands on it. Then we can attack on other fronts related to governance, outright lying about Obama's record, reading a speech she didn't even come close to writing, etc.

I saw a great line the other day in a random comment somewhere, all the fuss over Palin's crazy life and ridiculous scandals makes Obama more normal. That's good for us.

Weird thing, for me: this trooper should have been fired (#117340)
by BlaiseP

a long while back. Drinking on duty? Cheeze 'n crackers! What's going on there?

However this happened, it was handled unprofessionally. If I'm going to remove anyone from my teams, I assemble the relevant details, vet them with a third party and have the client fire them. The governor could and should have done the same. Even giving Palin every benefit of the doubt, this episode shows her inept leadership skills. She knew this guy was family: never, ever go after someone when there's a potential conflict of interest. Let someone else go after them. If she sicced a private investigator on her brother-in-law, turn the findings over to an internal affairs officer in a sealed envelope, and walk out before he opens it.

Palin was out of her league at every level of her political career. She needed better advisers and better lawyers. She's impolitic, riding roughshod over everyone. Now she needs to look like a leader and doesn't. More importantly, it now appears she hasn't been telling the truth about this ongoing farce: she might be forgiven the business of Bristol's baby but Troopergate will not be forgiven, not by the internal Republican machine.

A clearinghouse on Palin rumors (#117321)
by Bird Dog

Here. After only a week, the number is 53. And there's about 8½ weeks to go.

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Wow (#117383)
by stillnotking

37. Yes, she did shoot a man in Reno. But it was not just to watch him die, as the WaPo smear would have it. He also owed her money.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

Not to Cherry PIck, But -- (#117323)
by Harley

Yes, she did fire the public safety guy — but he said in the Anchorage paper that, for the record, she never, and no one else in her administration ever, tried to make him fire her ex-brother-in-law...

This suggests the rumor-collector has only a vague familiarity with Troopergate and 'the public safety guy'. But I'm assuming the list is mostly in fun anyway.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

2. Yes, there are people (#117322)
by nilsey

2. Yes, there are people in Alaska who think she’s too liberal.

wow, thats quite the rumor. 52 more, you say? those awful dems.

There are people in Alaska (#117387)
by stillnotking

who think Attila the Hun was too liberal.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

Well ... OK (#117319)
by Elagabalus

I don't want to mention any names but I heard she likes non-dairy creamer with her Sanka in the morning ...

--

I had discovered a great secret. That everyone loves themselves more than they love anybody else. And if I wanted them to love me, I better be like THEM!... Ken Nordine

I'm Going To Assume (#117326)
by Harley

That both 'non-dairy creamer' and 'Sanka' are euphemisms.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Worse yet, they aren't.... - nt (#117449)
by Bernard Guerrero
Recent Diaries
Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
The Head Heeb
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary