George W. Bush, apparently not satisfied with what looks to be a massive electoral repudiation of him, his policies and his sycophants inside government and out, is attempting to put more fuel on the fire. In a campaign speech today, he stated "However they put it, the Democrat approach in Iraq comes down to this: The terrorists win and America loses". The only comfort I take in this despicable statement is that Bush is a perfect indicator: whatever he states as true is virtually always demonstrably false. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt when it comes to his dog.
The amusing thing at this point is how Bush is avoiding (or being asked to avoid) closely contested districts like the plague. It seems that whenever he appears, the local Republicans discover previously unknown scheduling conflicts and appointments (most likely at the local Kinko's to work on their resumes). He is still appearing in districts in the South, because as a political observer in North Carolina memorably put it, "Having the president in your district in the South is still probably a risk worth taking".
Some believe that a large Republican loss in this election will make Bush more circumspect, and more likely to moderate his approach and look for compromise with Democrats. I don't believe it for a minute. I see a future of increasingly irrelevant shrillness, until he finally becomes the embarrassing old man shuffling through our newspapers and television broadcasts, incoherently warning about phantoms, contradicting himself from one sentence to another, while everyone does their best to avert their eyes and hope for 2009 to arrive as quickly as possible.



Hey Hank, please don't do repsonsive diaries like this
(#6118)We had bad experiences with diaries stacking on each other when response diaries went up.
Now obviously your topic is different, can you please alter the title? Thanks.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Many Thanks Hank! Now can I delete this two comments
(#6127)so I don't look stupid? OK with you or should I leave them up?
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
I changed the title as a favor to you
(#6142)but I really don't see the problem. I intentionally wanted to make the contrast of what Kerry said, with wall-to-wall coverage, with the far worse thing that Bush said to no notice at all.
You don't look stupid, just partisan :)
I blame it all on the Internet
Again, Mahalo
(#6145)We just had a bad period at the old place where the diaries went like that and it quickly turned into a flame war. So again, thanks.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Jeez
(#6149)one week to go to the election and we can't have at least one half decent flame war? What's the point of posting at a political site, anyway? Next you'll be telling me I can't rub it in Republican's faces (or vice versa) when the results come in!
C'mon JM, please? Pretty please? I promise I'll clean my room afterwards.
I blame it all on the Internet
There will of course be a mandated Gloating Period
(#6153)following the election [stops to pull waistcoat down over belly, adjust bifocals, put down pipe and look down nose]
I will write a diary the night before explaining the outcome requirments for allowable Gloating, Triumphalism, Sneering, Trash Talking and Gleefullness as well as the time frame involved.
Standards will be, ahem, heavily relaxed :)
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
You don't get it
(#6156)you lose about 90% of the gloating if you don't let people get way out on a limb ahead of time.
Whatever. I just don't want this to turn into a forvm for pvssies. Flames, flames I say! The higher and hotter the better!
I blame it all on the Internet
Heck, I figured the predictions did that?
(#6159)What do I know, I'm head Pvssie around here.
I'm trying to make the best out of a bad situation. I don't need to hear crap from a bunch of hippie freaks living in denial! Screw you guys, I'm going home!
Pvssies!
(#6626)Bravo, Hank.
"I don't want us to descend into a nation of bloggers." - Steve Jobs
You know...
(#6241)Tradesports still has the Reps with a better chance of winning the House than the Dems have of winning the Senate. (32% versus 29%). I'm not celebrating yet.
"I don't want us to descend into a nation of bloggers." - Steve Jobs
But if you look at each individual race
(#6629)(rather than just the general question), Tradesports has the Dems with a greater than 50% of winning.
Barkley Rosser in a comment on some site quipped: does this mean that markets are inefficient?
6 years down the road
(#6125)I feel like an abused spouse, but I'll write something I haven't had occasion to write for a while - Bush was a decent Governor when he had to deal with a Democratic state house here in Texas. Six years of political combat may have drained his desire to compromise, and the congressional Dems are a whole lot tougher than the Texas Dems, but I still hold out a little hope.
Whew. That was the first nice thing I've said about Bush in a while. Feels weird.
"There are sneakers that cost more than an iPod." -Steve Jobs
I don't think the two offices are comparable,
(#6303)sebastien: IIRC, one of the main points in the 2000 (and to a lesser extent 2004) election(s) was that the Texas Governorship was a relatively powerless position compared to other Governors (and certainly POTUS!); a situation that more-or-less militated an exercise in "compromise".
I think it's vastly diffferent today: his fundamental personality problems; six years of "I'm the Decider" and "War President" self-puffery - aided and abetted by a frighteningly efficient political machine on a national scale - AND a generally compliant legislature; have left George Bush wildly unpracticed in real "political" skills (which he was probably not very good at to begin with): that reverses of fortune would turn him "desperate and shrill" shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
George W. Bush: a small man rattling around in a BIG office.
I miss Karen
(#6725)I get the small man, big office feeling a lot about Bush, and his legacy is this - not Texas. But it's still a little weird to me because I got to know Bush here in Austin, where he even pissed off a few Republicans for being too buddy-buddy with a couple of Dem state senators. I think the loss of Karen Hughes' daily advice was a bigger blow than we all understood at the time.
"There are sneakers that cost more than an iPod." -Steve Jobs
Bush demeans the Presidency
(#6126)The kinds of lines he has delivered recently are for party functionairies, whips, campaign committee chairs and the like. I could even imagine the Vice President treading on these grounds but only as a desparation act because it's so close to an election that looks like a looming disaster.
But even in an emergency, the President should not campaign as Bush has done in the last week. I don't remember another President speaking so divisively on such a regular basis--not even close.
Where Did Mr. Bush Go Wrong?
(#6190)I of course voted and worked against him...but I had hopes, even after the second Victory speech in `04 that, somehow, miraculously even maybe, that things would work out.
I was wrong again. History will be very unkind to Mr. Bush, of this I am certain, but I suspect that the more thoughtful will rock back in their chairs and muse...Where did it all go wrong for Mr. Bush, what flaw, what character trait, what process set this on such an amazingly dirty and destructive course? His father? Inner daemons? Just pig-headed stupidity?
My short answer will be:
With Mr. Bush, It was all only politics, politics all the time.
Because that's where he lost me, in what I saw as him politicizing the War. If ever there was a time, a moment when he maybe could of risen above himself, seize some vision of greatness...but he couldn't, it was always just politics.
Interestingly, I see this even reflected here at the Forvm. The conversation is most often about domestic politics, (though the issues are truly worldwide, but who cares what the world thinks, or what their perception might be? Hey, thinking about the world, that's real work)...and I just don't get it, but maybe I do. The tone was set in the White House and permeates even out to here.
So the war in the trenches here, as well as the White House, aren't about external threats and how to deal with them, the war is about defeating & disgracing domestic enemies.
Weird.
Certainly odd for a Country allegedly in an existential struggle with a full fifth of the world's population.
Unless of course we’re not.
There are important things to be done.
But we are nowhere even close to dealing with what these might be and formulating a successful approach.
Best Wishes,
Traveller
Weirder and Weirder
(#6232)Don't forget. This is a thorny small-minded dude with a very big chip on his shoulder. About his Dad, about his brother, about the way people see him, about....well, about a whole lotta stuff. One of his favorite jokes is to welcome some visiting expert with a line that goes more or less like this: 'A' may be the world's greatest expert on blank, but I'M president of the United States. Heh, heh.
It's all about inferiority and anger. And now, as the failures mount, the ridicule becomes impossible to ignore, as members of his own party avoid him like the plague....
Hoo boy. It's gonna get very very interesting.
“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco
Far be it from me to say that there's a lot of
(#6248)desperation and shrill about... :)
The K Codes explained HERE.