Crunch Time In America: An Interview With Economist Jared Bernstein


The topic below was originally posted on my blog, the Intrepid Liberal Journal on April 6th and x-posted today at The Wild, Wild Left, The Peace Tree,The Independent Bloggers Alliance and Worldwide Sawdust.

How many economists have you read or watched on television in recent years that claimed the economy was performing well while you struggled to make ends meat and keep up with the cost of living? Indeed, until recently a happy talk virus had infected a cabal of conservative plutocrats who preached the virtues of limited regulation, market forces and free trade as wages declined and predatory lenders had a party. It seemed we were hearing conservative politicians and their mouthpieces at the Heritage Foundation or Fox news refer to the economy as “the greatest story never told” at every opportunity.

Now that the housing and credit crisis has metastasized, conservative apparatchiks are fighting to minimize government intervention on behalf of regular folks while preserving corporate welfare. They accuse anyone who raises a fuss of waging class warfare. Instead these agents of the status quo prefer we erroneously obsess about Social Security going bust and agree to privatize it for Wall Street's benefit.

Thankfully, renowned economist and the director of the Living Standards Program for the Economic Policy Institute, Jared Bernstein is using his megaphone to fight the madness. With his new book, Crunch: Why Do I Feel So Squeezed? (And Other Economic Mysteries), Bernstein responds to dozens of questions asked by working Americans that relate to the dollars and cents concerns of real people. Bernstein who often appears as a commentator on CNBC wrote in the preface of his book that,

“I’m tired of being stuck in the studio engaging in rants with Darth Vaders with PhDs. Wouldn’t it be more useful to have an open-ended, rant-free dialogue with real, everyday people about their economic questions.”

With Crunch, Bernstein effectively validates the daily experience of working people struggling to keep up in a treadmill economy. He also adroitly writes with accessible prose and powerful anecdotes to both educate readers about economic nuances and empower them to influence politics in a more populist direction. Bernstein contends that the rich and powerful have as much influence on who benefits from the economy as the will of the market. He therefore hopes to inspire readers not to cede any more ground to the practitioners of hyper individualism at the expense of the American community.

One of the most memorable anecdotes in Bernstein’s book describes how Circuit City announced it planned to lay off 3,400 sales associates in the spring of 2007 in order to appease their shareholders. Bernstein utilized this anecdote to illustrate how corporate greed is both heartless and self-defeating:

“Talk about in-your face management. I can absolutely see why a firm whose stock was down by a third over the past year would decide to make some big changes. But unless your workforce is truly overpaid, replacing a big chunk of it with lower-paid workers is a recipe for lousier service, fewer sales, and lower profits. At the time, many predicted that after the initial jump, stock prices would sink further. We were wrong, though. They never got that initial bump, and the stock just kept sliding, down 15 percent a few months later (while the overall stock market was up strong).”

It’s that kind of prose that led former North Carolina Senator and populist presidential candidate John Edwards to issue the following praise:

“Jared Bernstein’s new book is a must read for everyone who cares about restoring economic fairness in an America with the greatest income inequality since the Great Depression. Drawing on everyday examples, Crunch is an accessible explanation of economic principles presented with equal parts of insight, humor, and stimulation. In the process, Bernstein explains how we got to where we are, what to do to fix it, and why fighting for a fair society is so important.”

An expert on issues of labor and income inequality, he frequently testifies on Capitol Hill. Bernstein is also the co-author of eight editions of The State of Working America and he posts frequently on Josh Marshall’s blog, TPM Café. Longtime readers/listeners of the Intrepid Liberal Journal may recall an interview he did for my blog after his book, All Together Now: Common Sense For A Fair Economy was published in 2006.

Bernstein agreed to a podcast interview over the telephone about his current book and the current challenges confronting the American economy. Our conversation was approximately forty-eight minutes and among the issues covered includes the housing and credit crisis, needed regulatory reform, healthcare, globalization, Social Security, America’s investment deficit and free trade.

This interview can also be accessed for free by searching for “Intrepid Liberal Journal” on Itunes.
--

Intrepid Liberal Journal

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
The answer would be.... (#88936)
by Bernard Guerrero

How many economists have you read or watched on television in recent years that claimed the economy was performing well while you struggled to make ends meat and keep up with the cost of living?

...none. I've absolutely been blowing the cost of living out of the water. Well, you asked.

--

The ultimate result of shielding man from the effects of folly is to people the world with fools. -Herbert Spencer

This Line From You ... (#88983)
by Intrepid Libera...

is worth the price of admission:

I've absolutely been blowing the cost of living out of the water.

--

Intrepid Liberal Journal

It is the world's oldest profession... (#89058)
by JKC

I guess you make your money where and how you can. : )

Good Lord! (#88993)
by Bernard Guerrero

You're like Banquo's ghost; I'm unsure how to respond when you actually show up.

--

The ultimate result of shielding man from the effects of folly is to people the world with fools. -Herbert Spencer

I am not sure that business and government (#88932)
by Gramsky

have conspired to increase the risk and burden upon
the general public in the USA... the public, or at least
the tax paying public, are the lenders of last resort
and thus underwrite every mistake that may damage the
economic system.

All risks taken in wall street and amongst businesses
are essentially shared with the public.

I blame J.P. Morgan (#89036)
by Timmy

who after resolving the economic crisis of 1907, was lambasted by Congress. Congress clearly understood that they had been carved out of the decision making in 07 and accordingly created the Federal Reserve.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

I guess it comes down (#89052)
by Gramsky

to some unknowns, how much government intervention
is required to soft land and wind up failed businesses
without bringing down the whole market.

Having JPM do it as in the old days isnt that practical
back then it was a true giant - not of cash, not of market
capitalisation or of size, but of influence, it would form
a alliance of banks that could underwrite, say the French
war loans, powerful but also a money making enterprise in
its own right.

The Fed is supposed to do a better job and a bigger one.
I am not sure letting JPM cheery pick without competition
from failed businesses is really a good thing.

A good point that got little notice in the Bear Sterns bailout (#89033)
by tomsyl

It doesn't always happen that way (Exxon, a Clinton-era creation, was left to flounder, for example), but more often than not. When people ask govt. spokespeople about the BS deal, they get some version of the old "What's good for General Motors is good for America" line.

But to me a greater concern is the current Admin's recent move to give the Federal Reserve Bank, which is already secretive enough, greatly expanded powers to step in behind the scenes and take over investment banks and the like without any open discussion of what it's up to. Any thoughts on this?

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

Great opportunities for making money (#89051)
by Gramsky

Bear Stearns was initialy 'bought' by JPM for $2 a share
in a deal approved and aided by the Fed. No open
competition and the scent if not the paper to show that
the fed was willing to reimburse JPM for any 'excessive'
or hidden losses.

After a few days we see revolt and $10 a share offer, the
facts regarding Bear being actually insolvent are not
clear but what is clear is that its London and NY real
estate will save JPM billions and that key trading desks
and client lists are highly prized... so while you could
say that Bears management are being punished for failure
JPM is picking up some Fed backed gold plated assets for
a song and little risk, and Bears best managers are being
absorbed not fired... its the line staff that will be
more at risk.

As to if this was the best way to do it ?. Well I am
not sure that Bear was on the ropes except in short
term cash flow and letting just JPM to feast on the
more succulent bits smacks of, well, cronyism.

Darth Vaders with PhDs. (#88927)
by Punditus Maximus

That's so accurate.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Who are some examples? (#89034)
by tomsyl

It would help me understand the point, which seems like a rant that is so general that it's meaningless.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

It's a general despair. (#89037)
by Punditus Maximus

The Chicago School economists are just so . . . vicious and hidebound, I guess. The proper response to any market distortion is always to deregulate, without any thought as to what institutions are necessary to give rise to reasonably good markets.

Separately, there just is absolutely no interest in the welfare of individual citizens; GDP growth is the end-all and be-all, and woe betide the man who notes that GDP growth does not factor in certain very important things.

Atrios had an anecdote which I can't find now, where a report showing slow US wage growth was actively cheered by the economists in the Fed cafeteria.

Econlog is perhaps the best example of this sort of blithe disinterest in both the people affected and the subject matter. Look at this front page -- FDR is an "American Mugabe?" Check out their health page and see how many times Kling gets taken to the woodshed for basic lack of knowledge of the field, yet feels utterly justified in offering sweeping proposals -- and condemnations of other persons' proposals.

It's why I got into the field. Too many people pretending that the assumptions underlying the pretty math are always valid, and not enough people wondering if the purpose of having an economy -- widespread prosperity and agency -- is being served.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

I remember the anecdote from Max Sawicky's blog not atrios. (#89047)
by catchy

Recent Diaries
Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
The Head Heeb
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary