This is the place for them.
This is the place for them.
Help support the Forvm by buying items through our links. All proceeds go to defraying our hosting costs.
If you want to order computer equipment, please go to my business site.
You can now search comments by user. Check it out here. (Registered users only)
To search for users and specific text, use the search box at the top left of the front page.
Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference
Related Sites
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
Foreign Affairs
Politics
War
Economics and Business
Science and Tech
Legal
Sports
Film and Music
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
News and Aggregators
Dead Tree Media
References

Thanks, MA
(#292783)and BTW, I'm changing my opinion of Martha Raddatz: she's pushing (Paul Ryan, anyway) a heck of a lot more than Jim Lehrer did :
big problem for Galt's Gulch Paul: Joe Biden has been around the scene for a while: that crack about Biden losing his family to a car crash - when Paul Ryan was two years old was a gem
I *love* that the Randroid
(#292784)is talking about how much he cares about the leeches and second handers.
Like all good Randians
(#292786)he's more of a leech than the people he's complaining about.
I blame it all on the Internet
"Your revolution is over, Mr. Lebowski! The bums lost!"
(#292799)-- says the goldbricker husband trying to rook his wife's trust fund
M Aurelius was probably right.
Paul Ryan isn't as good a liar as Romney
(#292785)but he's making lots of statements that just aren't true. I don't think he's being very effective though.
I blame it all on the Internet
IMHO, partisan as it may be...
(#292788)BFD Joe is walking all over Rep. Ryan. With cleats.
Oh, snap: Syria!
AND....: Russia-bashing and wishful thinking! UN-bashing and more Russki-kicking! And more wishful-thinking about "allies"???
The onion is having a field
(#292787)The onion is having a field day with Biden "covering" the debates.
Biden Unleashes Torrent Of Vomit On Debate Stage
Biden Puts On Lucky Debate Suit
Biden's Handlers Suggesting He Forget The Words 'Pink' And 'Stink' Altogether
Biden is live tweeting the debates on the onion's twitter feed.
Malarkey!
(#292790)With all due respect.
And Robert Bork!!!
(#292793)Though I wonder how large a percentage of the audience is going to say.... "Robert Who??"
Who Cares About Bork?
(#292794)It's all about the Malarkey.
Anyone who has even remotely studied recent history
(#292797)ought to care about Robert Bork, and the pernicious influence this cranky character has had, and still has, on the discourse we have regarding the direction of our judiciary. Bork having even the remotest influence on a Presidential candidate ought to, IMO, disqualify them from consideration for public office - absolutely and completely.
Yeah, All That Is True
(#292800)But Malarkey! is trending.
The least you could do is work Malarkey! into a comment.
Ok, dude: just for you, notyou...
(#292802)Paul Ryan proved himself fully and completely full of Malarkey!
Though the comments from the (ABC) commentators are a close second....
From the younger generation
(#292806)I blame it all on the Internet
Watched on PBS
(#292813)Gotta watch it while I can before Romney sh!tcans it.
Anyway. David Brooks was on the panel... and guess what HIS first comment about?
That's right. Malarkey!
Your Opinion Is Noted
(#292801)It doesn't seem to have much sway in reality.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Bork isn't all that bad
(#292976)Yeah, I'm conservative on judges. In fact the worst thing he has to say (IMO) is his position on jury nullification; he's dead set against it.
It would surprise may here to know that Bork believes that the 2nd amendment only guarantees a right to join a militia.
The Constitution does not vest in Congress the authority to protect society from every bad act that might befall it. -- Clarence Thomas
Final analysis: Ryan got in some good shots, but mostly
(#292803)Biden nutstomped him on nearly every issue that came up. I think Joe fumbled his explanation of taxes and the economy a bit, but mostly this looked like an amateur debating a professional. A well-trained amateur with a decent skillset, but shouldn't've been in the same ring.
M Aurelius was probably right.
502 results on Google News for "Biden Smirk"
(#292804)Yeah, that usually goes over well.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
So you got nothin'
(#292807)Thanks for confirming that.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
Visual Cues Have Major Impact In Debates. . .
(#292808). . .and apparently a lot of people thought that Biden looked like a horse's @$$.
Intrade has edged slightly in Obama's direction, less than a point. Obama will be lucky if the actual impact on the polls resembles that.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
I'd Smirk Too, Ryan Wants American Soldiers In Iran, Syria...
(#292811)...and maybe for the next 20 years in Afghanistan.
Good old Joe nailed Ryan who would not or could not say when he would leave Afghanistan.
Isn't 12 years of our treasure and blood enough?
Congressman Ryan had no answer at all.
Traveller
Did you catch Ryan's flub...
(#292829)... where, after repeating (for the severalth time) that we shouldn't have "American boots on the ground" in Syria, he them started bitching about the US's lack of troops in Iraq, which might have "dealt" with the situation? And then quickly abandoned the subject? Too bad VP Joe didn't call him on that: [further] exposing the Romney/Ryan "foreign policy position" as the scaremongering BS it is might have had a bit more impact.
NRO whines: "Joe the Bully."
(#292812)I guess that explains why Ryan spent so much of the debate fighting back tears...how does the younger generation put it? Crying like a b*tch.
M Aurelius was probably right.
The granny Starver brought those clear blues
(#292815)..and Joe brought his broad smile. Advantage Joe.
"Something I think most liberals don't understand is exactly how stupid many conservative leaders are." - Matt Yglesias
They Do
(#292830)And I'll take Biden's grin over Ryan's animatronic look any day of the week.
I do agree the poll impact will be minor though, but to the extent there is one, it will be postive for the democrats.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
Seriously?
(#292818)Of all the people here you're complaining about that word?
I blame it all on the Internet
I'm Not Running For Office
(#292820)If you ever see me doing so, please assume that my family is being held hostage to cause it and notify the authorities immediately.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Go for it
(#292824)just imagine a D&D game where the media is the dice, the rules are written (and re-written) by a first grader and all the participants are, uh, differently abled.
I blame it all on the Internet
Rubbed me the wrong way too
(#292838)But only because he was pandering to the MSE psychographic.
"I don't want us to descend into a nation of bloggers." - Steve Jobs
Biden Had the Edge
(#292805)He was not as eloquent as I'd like, but at least he had fighting spirit and he kept up the pressure.
Thanks to that, it was way more obvious when Ryan was lying than it was with Romney. Biden also handled the abortion question very well, even as Martha mixed it in with their religion (a really sneaky move I thought). She was visibly favoring Ryan.
It's hard for me to say how much Biden "won" by. What I can say, easily, is that Ryan gained no traction from this. He looked and sounded slick and rehearsed.
All this said, the poll impact should be minor. I think Nate Silver is correct that the VP debate does not have a strong impact in any race, unless the candidate is a total disaster, like Palin.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
Biden doesn't do eloquent, he does emotion
(#292809)and he did a pretty good job of it tonight. He was also strong in fact checking. The order of the topics favored Biden, I think he got Ryan off balance on Afghanistan and kept him there for the remainder of the night.
I blame it all on the Internet
Defintely time favored Biden
(#292827)It was somewhat even at first, and Ryan gradually lost room to maneuver and fell back on visibly rehearsed talking points.
He went from barely-plausible-earnestness to used-car-salesman in the span of 60 minutes. By the end, he was just about ready to throw in free gas for the first 500 miles.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
I think Ryan's voice hurt him too
(#292833)Biden is an older guy with a deep voice, Ryan has a higher pitched voice that tends to get squeaky when he's on the defensive. That doesn't appeal.
What I noticed that Biden did a really good job of illustrating was that in areas like foreign policy the GOP criticizes endlessly, but when pushed basically agrees with the Dem position. On issues like the economy and Medicare, the GOP keeps saying that they're just like the Dems when they're actually very different.
I blame it all on the Internet
Missed opportunity in the Medicare segment:
(#292810)Ryan's now claiming that his latest version of Vouchercare will have premium support subsidized by wealthier beneficiaries. In other words: guaranteed coverage for everyone, and 100% (or close to that) premium support for poorer beneficiaries.
Anyone see the problem with that plan? Anyone? Anyone?
THAT'S MEDICARE! Ryan's plan will do essentially the same thing using essentially the same money as the current Medicare program, with the exception that the money will make an extra little circuit through the pockets of private insurers. Why in God's name should we change the program to do the same thing, only with a bigger cut for private insurers who don't actually provide health care?
Biden hinted at this point, but didn't really slam it home. He said "Well there go your savings!" or something like that, which is exactly right. All the money Vouchercare is supposed to save from the deficit goes right out the window if you're offering 100% premium support to people who need it. You might save some money from trimming benefits for wealthier seniors, but you could get there by means testing with no need to scrap the country's far and away most efficient and effective health insurance system. And then of course an entire "means-shelter" industry will grow up to hide grandma & granpa's mattress money from the government.
This sounds like a really dumb program. Either it guts benefits, or it offers zero improvement over current Medicare. I'd love for someone to argue in favor of this bizarre idea.
M Aurelius was probably right.
You act like that matters
(#292814)The GOP doesn't care and the low information voters don't do math or program details.
I think Biden did it right, and won because he didn't get in the weeds on the numbers. He said it was about supporting the middle class and which party has shown that they'll do it. I'm glad that he repeated that the GOP has always wanted to end Medicare and SS, because it's true and doesn't get repeated often enough.
I blame it all on the Internet
Wrong, you explain it like Clinton and people get it.
(#292816)Vouchercare either cuts benefits, or it offers no savings and no advantage over Medicare. It's simple, just have to repeat it clearly enough so that even the slow readers hear about it.
M Aurelius was probably right.
That's great if you have Bill Clinton handy
(#292819)unfortunately politics doesn't have a designated hitter rule.
I blame it all on the Internet
Fair point, but I don't think you need Bill.
(#292822)Really I think too many political-type people sincerely believe the public doesn't care about facts, doesn't want to hear wonky details. Clinton has always believed the exact opposite: people *do* want the wonky details, they just want them translated into plain English. Don't patronize the public, in other words.
M Aurelius was probably right.
All I can say
(#292825)is that since his approach obviously works really well, why is it that so few politicians even attempt it? The only conclusion I can draw is that it's a lot harder than it looks.
I blame it all on the Internet
I think it is hard, but I also think many people believe
(#292826)that it shouldn't be tried (on a theory that the public doesn't care about it).
M Aurelius was probably right.
I Think They Avoid The Details Because Translating
(#292828)is hard, but mostly they avoid it 'cause they don't want to be pinned down when it's trading time.
I think the problem
(#292831)is that it's a big risk. If you do it well, like Clinton, it can work really well and there are huge benefits. But if you screw it up then eyes glaze over and you become a wonk that no one wants to hear from. And once tagged that way, it's very difficult to recover.
I blame it all on the Internet
How many hours did Obama rehearse with Clinton?
(#292978)Probably zero. You've got the best debater in the past 30 years available, use him.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
"Oh, now you're Jack Kennedy!"
(#292817)Ryan walked right into that one.
M Aurelius was probably right.
Top Marginal Rate when JFK took office, 91%
(#292845)It's 35% right now.......................
"I’m to believe that North Korea is so dangerously unhinged that they would attack without warning – yet so meek and easily cowed that they will sit quietly and not retaliate when we start bombing them."
Major Kong
I thought
(#292821)Biden might have rubbed some female independents the wrong way with his treatment of Raddatz, but he more than made up for it with Reagan Democrats in Ohio, who I'm sure are going "f*ck yeah" at his firebrand populism. On style and substance, big win for Joltin' Joe. Give him his due... he can grab you by the lapels like no other politician.
"I don't want us to descend into a nation of bloggers." - Steve Jobs
Agreed
(#292832)He got the blue collar vote as much as any democrat could, and especially in Ohio, PA, and so on.
With women it comes down to abortion. He really got Ryan in the spot there, for being against abortions even in cases of rape and incest. Ryan could not backtrack on that one, so he did what he could, but the punch landed.
If you are an anti-abortion woman, you are not likely to be much of an independent anyway.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
I thought Raddatz was a lousy moderator
(#292839)it's the whole Diane Sawyer emotional manipulation bulls(*t that's infected reporters. I hate it. Also begging the question repeatedly. My problem areas highlighted.
I blame it all on the Internet
I thought Raddatz was pretty good as a moderator,
(#292850)but as a reporter/referee she sure was tilting the table a lot.
The "projected 6 percent unemployment" line was particularly heinous, as that is a pure Republican talking point. It was a projection from a Romer white paper based on economic projections that have since been revised drastically downward. It was accurate based on estimates at the time. Even Politifact has called this one a BS Republican talking point.
M Aurelius was probably right.
She did push for specifics, which is good
(#292869)but the questions, which she had plenty of time to come up with, were awful. They're a pure essence of inside the beltway views on economics which are completely incorrect (SS and Medicare can't go "bankrupt") and are overly emotional and cloying.
Like I said, it reminds me of Diane Sawyer, I can't even watch her anymore. The faux concern that drips out over every human interest story makes me want to puke.
I blame it all on the Internet
Sounds like she was graded on a heavy curve
(#292879).
Weird, rude and contemptuous is not a good...
(#292905)...combination. I don't think Joe helped Barry. On the facts, there were of shortcomings on both sides. And then there was his senior moment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particula
I Guess Kerry Handled Joe's Debate Prep, Too
(#292906)He was for them before he was against them. ]:-)
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Lying is rude
(#292929)..pointing out the lying is not being rude.
"Something I think most liberals don't understand is exactly how stupid many conservative leaders are." - Matt Yglesias
So in Left Wing Bizarro World,
(#292941)Biden spoke no untruths? Ooookay. And yes, Biden was weird, rude and contemptuous, which I'm sure played played well to the liberal base, but not so much outside the left-wing echo chamber.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particula
Obama Intrade Is Back Below 60
(#292943)Let the bleeding continue! ]:-)
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
I thought Biden was awesome. He was himself, which
(#292937)is kind of naturally, gloriously obnoxious. Did he really say he voted against the Iraq War though?
M Aurelius was probably right.
So sayeth Joe
(#292949)Biden voted yea on the AUMFs for both Afghanistan and Iraq. I was giving Joe the benefit of the doubt when I said "senior moment". A less charitable person could say that he was dishonest or lied. According to sparti, it would not be rude to point that out.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particula
Biden's obviously talking about tax cuts during wartime
(#292950)The AUMF had nothing to do with funding the wars.
The inaccuracy in Biden's statement is that running a deficit didn't cause the recession, failing to regulate a housing bubble and the financial sector did.
Since He Threw In The "Two Wars On The Credit Card" Riff. . .
(#292954). . .any ambiguity is on him--he certainly seems to be at the very least downplaying his own support of those wars.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
If an ambiguity is the worst that happened in the debate
(#292959)it's far and away the most accurate political debate at the national level of my lifetime and probably yours.
Next.
But It Wasn't
(#292960)And Obama's bleeding seems to have resumed. Sorry, Joe.
The universe may well have been created without a point--that doesn't imply that we can't give it one.
Joe did fine
(#292977)And what part of "on a credit card" is so hard to understand? It's not ambiguous at all.
I am not a pessimist. I am an incompetent optimist.
Uh, oh, Bird Dog. Catchy appears to be right.
(#292956)From a close reading it would appear Biden, in his admittedly sloppy idiom, was talking about financing for the Bush tax cuts & wars, not for the AUMF itself. Do you happen to have a line on Biden's fiscal votes at the time? Otherwise I'm afraid you're going to have to bank your outrage until the facts are more congenial.
M Aurelius was probably right.
No, he wasn't
(#292958)Biden voted for both wars and he voted for their funding (link). Biden made an across-the-board statement that he voted against Ryan on the WAMI, prescription drugs, etc. His statement was false because, although he made a lot of noises, he voted to wage war and he voted for its funding.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particula
Biden in 1 word
(#292932)Incredulousness.
~At times like these I am reminded of the immortal words of Socrates when he said...."I drank what?"
Joe Was Probably Referring to The Biden-Brownback Resolution
(#292966)The plan, named The Biden-Brownback Resolution, passed the Senate 75-23 in a nonbinding vote on September 25, 2007, including 26 Republican votes. Iraq’s political leadership united in denouncing the resolution, while the Embassy of the United States in Baghdad issued a statement distancing itself.[53]
Just sayin`...Noisy, Noisy rents the Fair Air of this Night
Traveller