. . ."If A White Guy Said It He'd Be Toast" sweepstakes, we have Mr. Jason Whitlock of the Kansas City Star explaining how Serena Williams, winner of 11 Grand Slam titles, is an underachiever with a fat @$$.*
Dude. Serena's father is a racist idiot, but if he slugged Whitlock in the jaw over this article I'd raise my glass to him.
*--Whitlock *is* getting a lot of flak for this piece, but his job is in no danger.


What are you talking about?
(#173204)I've heard Mary Carillo say some variant of that about Serena more times--on broadcast & major cable TV, to boot--than I can count. Though in fairness, Carillo has not expressed a preference between "onion booties" vs "oozing pumpkins."
Seriously--it's in horrible taste, and I wouldn't blame Mr. Williams for knocking his block off either. (I'd be a little more worried about Serena herself kicking my ass, mind.) Taking the sexism out of the picture, though, you know, I think a lot of people would've been surprised if, after Serena's 2003-2004 year, you'd told them that she'd be nowhere near Steffi Graf's Slam total at this point in her career.
Bene vixit, bene qui latuit
If One Carefully Extracts. . .
(#173221). . .the sexist crudity out of the argument, it's a variation on what people used to say about Mickey Mantle in various ways: if he tried harder/didn't spend all his time partying, he'd be the greatest player who ever lived. Of course, there were three major problems with this argument:
--Mantle spent his entire career in pain, from osteomyelitis that was bad enough to make him 4F during the Korean War, and later with a horrifying string of injuries: partying all the time might have been the only thing that kept him going through that;
--he was convinced that he wouldn't live to see forty, because all of his male relatives had died young from various diseases related to the mining profession. Maybe he should have worked harder at his craft and recovering from injuries rather than partying, but it's probably harder to stay focused when you're convinced your time on this planet is short;
--he *was* one of the greatest players ever: I'd take his career over any center fielder other than Mays, Cobb, and maybe Speaker, and in terms of absolute peak value there was no one better (he won three MVPs and really should have won six or seven).
Now, I'm not saying that Serena has had demons like Mickey did, but who knows? David Duval's recent re-emergence at the US Open is a rather blatant reminder that a top-notch athlete can flame out suddenly and be more or less finished at a young age--Serena's made a remarkable resurgence and deserves credit for it, not to have some joker telling her that she's fat and that she can do better than winning three out of the last four majors.
Steffi's a pretty hard nut to crack (and, to bring up an unfortunate fact that causes me to shake a fist at the German penal system, she probably has at least four or five titles that would be in Monica Seles' trophy case if that lunatic hadn't destroyed her career), but Serena is looking awfully good these days, and might make a late career run at the big number. Even if she doesn't, seeing an allegedly competent writer suggest that winning eleven Grand Slam titles is somehow underachieving is rather appalling.
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
- reply
parentI think there's something to the idea
(#173325)... that what we usually consider 'mental' deficiencies among professional athletes shouldn't be thought of any differently than physical ailments. So if Serena couldn't manage to sustain the desire to dominate the game the way she did around 2004, why should that be considered differently than (say) Nadal's tendinitis-prone knees?
Also, there's no denying that Serena is just head-and-shoulders above the rest of the competition in women's tennis, whatever the state of her conditioning. Maybe in the not too distant future, Azarenka will turn into competition on hard courts, and maybe Sharapova will manage to make a full comeback, but otherwise, since Henin's retirement--there's just no one in the same league.
And if we want to talk sexism in women's tennis, what about this? That's a remarkable admission, I think--though not a surprising one.
Bene vixit, bene qui latuit
- reply
parent