Is Sarkozy saying they're going to pass legislation against wearing burkas?

Is this only going to be at state schools like the headscarf or every public place?

What about veils at funerals or as warn by nuns? How do you differentiate and is there any genuine protection of veils or nun outfits?

I like the idea of combating burkas in the open market of ideas. But I can't see how such ideas could be appropriately codified into law.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/13/way-off-base/

This man and his ideas have been thoroughly discredited. I'm not interested in his observations. We may have printed too much currency, and that may lead to inflation, but I'd rather hear about it from some non-insane, actual expert.

Btw, I missed your comments on ham in Spain. How did it go?

nt

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/06/19/gay_rights/

Back when he started talking about what a bad idea it was for the U.S. to have gone to war against the Axis Powers. And when it comes to foreign policy, I think that his motives have always been less than pure when he goes off on how Israel is driving American wars in the Middle East. I put him in the same bucket as writers like Joseph Sobran and Samuel Francis (sorry Vinteuil). Even when they've got a good point, it's too wrapped up in their larger worldview, which is not a little problematic.

That even with the Southern Strategy the mainstream right has at least publicly embraced racial equality and rejected Jew-hating is something that we ought not take for granted. There's a nastier strain of thought out there in conservatism that should positively not be let back in.

Froomkin was pretty much the only independent, interesting voice at the Post, though George Will has his moments.

My guess is he accumulated a little too much moral/political street cred. Some people feel threatened by that.

THe broken promise would be if the Obama admin. was in no way reviewing our surveillance programs in hopes of preserving civil liberties, etc. The Holder quote is specifically about the FISA compromise. Did he speak to the admin's desire or lack of it when it comes to reviewing our surveillance programs?

Thanks, oh promise keeper.

i'm disappointed you didn't decide to make this comment into a full diary, given your full and qualified substantive disagreement with the wording of an op-ed headline.

into binding and official foreign policy for the US, we could save a lot of $.

So, you're all about giving advice, but I just wanted to float the idea that perhaps the Obama admin knows what it's doin:

-- Iraq in January punishes the hard-line clerics

-- Kuwait in May elects 4 women MPs and hardline Sunnis lose ground

-- Lebanon 2 weeks ago increases its pro-western majority.

-- And now hundreds of thousands of Iranians are on the street in favor of a reformist.

On the assumption that these events are affected by the US, maybe Obama should just keep doin whatever he's doin.

Authors don't generally get to write their headlines.

.

They ate/eat beef, even.

As are the vast majority of Tibetan and Sikkimese Buddhists. Also the Buddhists in Vietnam and Thailand. And Korea and Japan. And very good the dishes are, too.

http://www.snowlionpub.com/chapters/lhmo.htm
http://www.recipesource.com/ethnic/asia/tibet/00/rec0003.html

I recommend the Potala Restaurant or Hotel Tibet in Gangtok for the world's best momos.

.

and not much concerned with bugs. PETA was probably thinking of the Jains (who are often erroneously conflated with Buddhists). Jains will not harm any living thing; Jain monks carry brooms with which they sweep insects from their path as they walk. Some of them won't even eat root vegetables, out of a belief that they are capable of suffering.

(I say "would turn" rather than "turns" because it's an argument that's not worth anyone's time.)

First, I find it a little disturbing that so many people don't seem to understand that process of a new President taking over control of the government is slow and somewhat random. There's still a lot of Bush people in the DOJ. The US Attorney for Nevada is Gregory A. Brower, a Bush appointee.

Second, even a President who has appointed a US Attorney has limited control over how he or she runs their office. That's why Bush fired some of them when they wouldn't toe the party line.

American taxpayers are expected do their own tax reporting. Honestly.

Harry Reid may be stupid. But his questioner is definitely a tool.

Gays need to stop voting for Democrats that support anti-gay legislation. That's it.

In this particular case Congress is more to blame than Obama, of course.

or so I've been told-

"It's not that he didn't follow through on his promises, he stabbed us in the back."

..