Reasons for the fall in crime in the US in the 1990s
Interesting study via a commenter on Matthew Yglesias
Edit: Actual article cite
Reasons examined and discarded
Economic boom of the 1990s
Change in demographics
Better policing
Gun control
Increase in concealed weapons
Capital punishment
Reasons examined and accepted
Increased police numbers
Ebbing crack epidemic
Increased prison population
Legalisation of abortion
In view of previous diaries and comments, it does seem to show, in general, that more police and a policy of locking up violent men works, at least in the US.
In other parts of the world, locking up people for long times may not be an option of course, purely from a financial perspective.
--
- mmghosh's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference
Related Sites -
Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)
Foreign Affairs -
Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
The Head Heeb
War and Piece
Politics -
Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net
War -
Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog
Economics and Business -
Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture
Science and Tech -
Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb
Legal -
Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy
Sports -
Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist
Books, Film and Music -
Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide
News and Aggregators -
Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post
References -

I was pretty convinced by the Freakonomics abortion argument.
The best part of that book was the organizational analysis of street gangs, though. It's striking how the same pattern repeats itself in all forms of business. Ties in rather nicely to Harford's CEO pay theory in The Logic of Life, too.
--The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.
- Login or register to post comments
)"Better" policing definitely had at least as much of an effect as more policing.
In my neighboring city of Lowell I had a chance to talk to two of the captains who were the lead implementation guys in a total change in the way they operate, away from "try to lock up criminals" to a focus on "community policing" (big buzzword now) first, get the criminals while you're doing it.
Downtown Lowell was a dump in the late 80s, early 90s.. HBO did a special called "High on Crack St" about the city. Stereotypical northern former industrial city, the mills that started the american industrial revolution were all empty, crappy schools, population of immigrants and minorities, lots of crime. Used to be the white cops would just roll into downtown every night, grab a drug dealer or two, lock them up and head back the next night. Problem was, there was always someone else there the next night. It wasn't working.
So they started doing "community policing" which I understand was also a big factor in the NYC turnaround. First thing, they rented office space in the middle of downtown and put a big LPD placard in the window. There to stay. They started holding community meetings to see what the residents were concerned about. Drugs? Muggings? No, turned out the biggest complaints were noise and vandalism. So they made those two things their biggest priorities to get buy-in from the neighborhood. Turned out, most of the violent offenders tended to make noise and vandalize as well, so they wound up getting the people they wanted anyways. Lead to a relationship with community leaders and buy-in from parents and other figures. Violent crime was down something like 40% within a a year or two and Lowell's on the upswing bigtime now, those abandoned mills have become loft condos and office space.
- Login or register to post comments
)Community policing is key. The store front precincts, bike patrols, beat cops, anything that gets the cops out of a squad car and into a neighborhood...the same neighborhood... can work really well. For the hardliners, intensive probation has also been shown to work.
--It's not only redundant, it's also repetitive
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )whatever other factors are involved. I watched the turnaround here in NYC (well, I moved here just after the trains were graffiti-proofed, was here for the "Quality of Life Crimes" era as well as the bust up of the notorious Street Crimes Unit).
--Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )You may find this article of interest (a series of recent academic studies has challenged the broken windows theory, opening a debate on its effectiveness).
--Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )The new Chief in Boston is Ed Davis, formerly of Lowell.
He's only been on a year or so and murders are still at a decades-high in boston over the last couple years, but hopefully his strategy works.
EDIT: Read the article and it seems to me they're attacking a straw man. They're talking about "if you just criminalize low level offenses you're just creating more criminals" -- that misses the point of the community policing strategy. The point is attending to the needs of the silent majority, not simply an ever-tightening vice grip on the community. If you criminalize the low level offenses without community outreach, I'd agree that that is not going to be productive.
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )I very much agree that a strategy involving community outreach and "cleaning up" the neighborhood in a fashion that the residents support and appreciate is a good idea and will have a downstream effect of reducing more serious crime.
Maybe it's a strawman but the way for example NYC under Rudy implemented the "broken windows" theory was heavy on the crackdown and light on the outreach.
--Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )had some serious drawbacks. I already mentioned the Street Crimes Unit, which could have been called Gang Of Thugs Who Harrass Young Black Men For No Damn Reason, and was disbanded after the Amadou Diallo shooting. The idea of SCU was basically to intimidate & bust heads, an approach which runs contrary to the community policing idea which did take hold in many other ways with the NYPD in those years.
--Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )better urban economies, plus "reversion to the mean" -- I'm not going to be surprised by any study that says enforcing petty crime *by itself* reduces crime significantly. I think the key to success was that it was part of a larger effort and a change in philosophy among many police departments away from adversarial relation to the communities they were policing.
--Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )my confidence in social scientists. I didn't read every word but the whole thing seems to be an exercise in equating correlation with causation.
Are we really expected to believe that the quality and methods of policing don't matter as long as you have the numbers? You could hire a bunch of incompetents who don't show up for their shifts, and crime would go down?
IMO all the things mentioned are swamped by intangibles having to do with culture and perception. In particular, people commit crimes if they think other people are committing crimes. It's entirely possible that part of the decrease is simply due to people saying crime is decreasing, in the same way that a Fed or Treasury official can drive stock prices down merely by announcing that they will go down. The increased prison population could be a result of a culture that is less tolerant of crime, rather than a cause.
- Login or register to post comments
)officers selects for a competent selection process, when taken in statistically large numbers. So, for example, this theory doesn't seem to be working in Iraq, when the criterion for being a policeman is being Badr rather than Sadr.
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )huge. The main reason for the massive carceral population here are legislated minimum sentences for drug offenses -- judges & juries are given no discretion in particular cases. Caught with a gram of crack? You're doing 15 years, period.
You have to start with that premise: 60% of inmates are nonviolent offenders. Then argue that it contributes to the drop in violent crime.
--Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH
- Login or register to post comments
)Locking up the 40% who *are* violent offenders for much longer periods of time ("three strikes" and the like) certainly has helped matters. As for the other 60%, a change of approach that freed up prison space for more violent offenders would indeed be welcome, but the fact that nonviolent offenders arguably shouldn't be taking up prison space doesn't say anything about the usefulness of locking up violent ones.
--- Login or register to post comments
| parent )There's no particular reason to think locking up nonviolent offenders reduces violent crime -- the common sense assumption would be that there ought to be better ways of dealing with the petty crack dealers and felony check forgers, and use penal system resources to make bigger inroads into stopping violent crime.
--Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )Crime rates in countries that switched from leaded to unleaded gasoline have seen dips in violent crime that roughly coincide with children who have grown up without breathing in lead fumes reaching adolescence.
Also, a very large part of our prison population consists of people locked up for non-violent drug convictions. I have a hard time believing that that is keeping our streets safer.
--Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven.
- Login or register to post comments
)I note, as well associated with a lowering of IQ?
Edit: Fixed the link.
- Login or register to post comments
| parent )