Watching the Arctic melt.


In case folk were unaware of it (as I was), 2007 kicked off the International Polar Year, with its own website.

There was a considerable amount of concern last year, as the extent of Arctic ice fell to the lowest recorded level, although tempered with the usual warnings about a single year's data. 2008 is not expected to reach the same levels although it is likely to be the 2nd lowest which was previously 2005 - check out the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency site.

From a strictly scientific point of view, there are some benefits to the opening up of the Northwest Passage

Polarstern Research vessel transits the Northwest Passage for the first time ever
Bremerhaven, August 19th 2008. German research vessel Polarstern, operated by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association, transits the Northwest Passage for the first time. Polarstern left the port of Reykjavik on August 12th, sailed around Greenland on a southern course and is located right now at the beginning of the Northwest Passage. Its destination is the East Siberian Sea where geoscientific measurements at the junction between the Mendeleev Ridge and the East Siberian Shelf are at the focus of the participants of this expedition. The measurements striven for in the framework of the International Polar Year shall help to understand how the undersea ridges and basins were built. This expedition takes the researchers in 68 days around the North Pole because the return voyage is to lead via the Northeast Passage.

Cryosphere Today maps show the current state of affairs -

1979 compared to 2008

2007 compared to 2008

Edit: I'm still in the process of trying to understand whether the consensus of experts thinnks that a summer-ice-free Arctic is a Good or a Bad Thing. Perhaps others could help out.
--

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Right (#112664)
by Juker

It is automatically assumed that increasing temperature is causing more melt than normal. That is not true (or mostly not).

It is a change in circulation and anomalous wind patterns, possibly related to a shift in the Arctic Oscillation. NASA describes it here and here. More ice than usual is being blown out of the region into warmer waters.

Regarding temperature, some sane perspective is seriously needed. Since the early 1980s there has been an increase of 1 degree C in latitudes above 60N and/or 70N (chart). Note also that in the 1940s temperature was about the same or perhaps even a bit warmer.

(Caption: 70-90N [top] and 60-90N [bottom]. Left scale is 100th C. Lower green line relates to percent observational coverage [right scale]. Forgot what upper green line is. Prepared by William Connolly from Jones CRU data. I can't find original url. Sorry.)

Maybe I'm just not imaginative enough but I don't see how such a small change can melt the arctic, kill all the polar bears, and crack Greenland in half :-)

Another borderline myth is on the Northwest Passage. Normally about 1/2 of arctic ice disappears, while last year it was about 2/3rds. Don't quote me, but I'm reading that it has always been more a navigation challenge than there being actual passageway. With modern satellites, GPS and so on it is not much of a feat anymore.

--



Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please --Mark Twain

Wrong (#112995)
by Floater

The Arctic oscillation is a factor in year to year variations in sea ice butit's not the only factor. You can see a time series of the AO here

Arctic
oscillation

And a time series of the sea ice extent here

Long term Arctic sea ice extent

While the big melt last year was in large part due to the AO the stage for that meltoff was set by the long term effects of global warming. You can see that in the summer ice figures which show a long term decline going back to the 50's.

The two links you posted are from the same study. If you read a little more carefully you'll see that the
y don't claim that global warming is unrelated to the the ice melting.

Your comment about the effect of a 1 degree Celsius temperature change is just silly. That's almost 2 degrees F and that makes a big difference when you're close to the melting point of snow or ice. The difference between 31 and 33 degrees F is a block of ice or a puddle of water or between a rainstorm and a blizzard.

P.S. It looks like this year is going to be very close to last year in termsof the size of the melt. The pattern of melting is different from last year but the total size of the melt is very close.

Current arctic sea ice
extent

Floater... (#113000)
by mmghosh

c'mon, you're the physics expert. I can understand the effect of decreasing albedo on AGW, but what we want to know is what the real problems are going to be from a summer-ice-free state in the Arctic.

If I can get some time (#113006)
by Floater

I'll write something up. The NYTimes did an excellent article a little while back discussing some of the political implications of an ice free arctic as well and I'll see if I can find the link to that.

Umm, Juker, the perspective is rather the reverse. (#112836)
by mmghosh

Check out what NASA report actually says. The problem is not that global warming is causing the Arctic to melt.

The point is that the Arctic ice melting is making the situation of AGW worse. This is because the Arctic ice cover is responsible for reflection of the summer sunlight away from the oceans. Lack of ice cover means increased heating of the oceans. That's one of the Bad things.

Of course, one of the Good things is that there is now increased access to the Arctic hydrocarbon deposits. This means we can continue with hydrocarbon based energy for longer and therefore increase the atmospheric CO2 content further, and so the experiment with increasing atmospheric GHGs can go on for longer in this century.

Yeah but the popular perception is rather the reverse (#112873)
by Juker

How many media articles have properly stated what NASA actually says? I could count the articles on my left hand -- provided I had a major chain saw accident in my youth.

Most believe the Arctic is melting because of temperature, pure and simple.

Generally I am happy that we agree :)

--



Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please --Mark Twain

sailed under Mathew Flinders and his cat (#112606)
by Micky Love

You recommended me a book not long ago.

Here's one I can whole-heartedly recommend back.

The Discovery of Slowness

It's a fictionalized (but mostly true) biography of Sir John Franklin, arctic explorer.

Franklin's idea of making the North West passage was to freeze the ship into the ice pack and let her drift through the passage. It was a catastrophic end to a brilliant career.

He'd been at the battle of Trafalgar, the battle of New Orleans, sailed under Mathew Flinders and his cat, and served a term as governor of Tasmania. Incidentally, Flinders was captured by the French, separated from his beloved Trim and imprisoned. When released, only the pelt was returned, the rest having been eaten. Melbourne was originally named after Trim, who in turn was named after the butler in Tristram Shandy.

--

Nothing resembles virtue more than a great crime. Saint-Just

Very interesting. (#112609)
by mmghosh

I'm all in favour of not pushing - my kids for example - for achievements.

Both good and bad (#112526)
by Floater

with the bad probably outweighing the good. More importantly it will raise a lot of new issues.

I'll pass (#112513)
by Bird Dog

I'd rather watch grass grow. More exciting.

I think humans have had some hand in AGW, but as to how much, I can't tell. Temperatures have gone down the last several years (since 1998-1999, I believe) and the Antarctic ice pack has grown. Sounds like less ice in the arctic is bad for polar bears, but as for other wildlife, I haven't heard.

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Come on Bird Dog (#112524)
by Floater

For a guy who claims to be concerned about security and geopolitics you're seriously missing the boat here. An ice free arctic has huge security implications for the US. And if some geologists are correct the arctic ocean basin is the last frontier when it comes to large deposits of oil and natural gas. If melting ice makes another Middle East at the top of the world accessible we'll see the Great Game all over again.

P.S. Not sure where you got the idea the temperatures have gone down either but conservatives in general seem to have a problem understanding the concept that a time series can have a trend without being monotonic.

Ahh, (#112531)
by Bird Dog

so there's a conspiracy to melt the polar ice cap because it's all about oil?

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Snark aside (#112544)
by Floater

the US Navy takes the issue of melting arctic ice quite seriously and is planning for it now. They initially didn't think it would be an issue for 20 or 30 more years but the pace of melting has speeded up so rapidly that it looks like it will have to be dealt with much sooner.

Could be! (#112541)
by Floater

You never know about those Russians and they did use a submarine to plant a flag on the sea bottom at the North Pole to claim it for themselves. Maybe they have giant bunsen burners down there! But whatever the reason the fact is that the arctic ice cap is melting. And outside of wingnuttia it's clear that it will have some serious national security implications. Besides potential hydrocarbon deposits the opening of both a Northwest and a Northeast passage has lots of ramifications for shipping lanes.

I thought "wingnut" originated with Ross Perot. (#112729)
by tomsyl

Don't tell me he's involved in this. T Boone Pickens is just about all I can take of that type.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

What about effects on currents - Gulf Stream etc? (#112554)
by mmghosh

I'm still trying to understand. You're the physics prof here.

And out-of-cycle sunspots? (#112728)
by tomsyl

-0-

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

effects on currents (#112560)
by Jay C

While I'm certainly no physics prof, I have heard that the recession of the Arctic ice cap itself will have relatively less effect on ocean currents in general: something to do, I think, with the fact that the north polar region is surrounded by landmasses; so the currents tend to flow in a circle. I think.

The real potential disruption, I have read, is in the possible melt-off of the Greenland ice sheets: the increased flow of cold fresh water there, I think, does have the potential to shift the Gulf Stream in one direction or another. With possible dire results for Northern Europe, if it shifts too drastically.

Of course, IANAClimatologist: corrections will be graciously accepted.

Flow reversal and hysteresis. (#112746)
by tomsyl

Has more to do with current changes. I don't know what that means, exactly; just trying to sound learned.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

It's clear in wingnuttia, too. (#112552)
by Punditus Maximus

It's just irrelevant; national security is only part of the conversation insofar as it can be manipulated to advance the Wingnut Agenda.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

I guess I'm out of that loop (#112581)
by Bird Dog

What precisely is the "Wingnut Agenda" for melting the polar ice cap? You seem to have some theories about it.

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Heh. (#112602)
by Punditus Maximus

That's kind of my point. There isn't one -- it can't be used to fight the culture war, so it's irrelevant. Trust me, as soon as there is a national security issue to be demagogued without solving, McCain's successor will be sure to pass along how to earn some camel bux online.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

So, (#112637)
by Bird Dog

Floater wrote that, "And outside of wingnuttia it's clear that it will have some serious national security implications."

Your response was "it's clear in wingnuttia, too"

But then in your follow-up response you said "there isn't one", a "wingnuttia" agenda, that is. Sounds contradictory.

BTW, what exactly is "wingnuttia" and who are in it? Just wondering.

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Bored now. (#112653)
by Punditus Maximus

Sorry, man. Maybe Bizarro Rush Limbaugh can explain what I meant, because I obviously cannot get any information across to you in this format.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Especially when the information is contradictory (#112742)
by Bird Dog

And you failed to answer my question, as you commonly do. But hey, the "bored" angle is a good one.

--

"I want America to know that I'm, like, totally ready to lead." -- Paris Hilton

Not really, no. (#112799)
by Punditus Maximus

The question implied total incomprehension of what I wrote before. I can't seem get from where I am to where you are, and it's not because I'm not trying from this end.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

you're confusing incomprehension with incomprehensible. (#112882)
by tomsyl

-o-o-

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

You're confusing something which is difficult to comprehend, (#112888)
by Punditus Maximus

with something it is important not to comprehend.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

You're confusing me (#112894)
by tomsyl

with someone who gives a hoot.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

Never. -nt- (#112916)
by Punditus Maximus

.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Zing! (#112924)
by catchy

You guys shhhhuuuure do fight nasty out there in ol Hawaii

They're trying to melt it just right so that you can read (#112584)
by catchy

RONALD REAGAN!

from space.

Arctic Cruises through the NW Passage (#112477)
by mmghosh

are increasing

This summer has seen a record number of boats - cruise ships, commercial vessels, military ships, and boats full of scientists - in the Arctic. Aware that the downward trend in ice cover is prompting an increase in boat traffic, the Canadian military decided to rehearse for any possible accidents:

Beginning tomorrow , the army, navy and air force will begin Operation Nanook 08, the latest in a series of manoeuvres designed to boost Canada's Arctic sovereignty and increase the military's ability to respond to emergencies.

Operation Nanook will simulate an outbreak of disease on a cruise ship, a hostage-taking on a cruise ship, a fuel spill and a fire on a Russian cargo ship.

Are the exercises necessary? More than you might think. Apparently the opening of the Northwest Passage is already drawing yachtees tired of the Caribbean:

A total of 26 commercial cruises are planned in the Canadian Arctic this season, a historic high and an increase of four trips over last summer. As well, at least eight private vessels are thought to be sailing in and around the Northwest Passage.

"Operation Nanook"? (#112486)
by Jay C

Geesh - who comes up with these names??

Actually, it's a smart move: cruise ships carrying tourists through the Fabled Northwest Passage may make for interesting feature copy, but the real problems are going to arise in the less-glamorous, but economically valuable container-ship traffic; which will only be on the increase when/if the Arctic icecap starts to retreat on a regular basis.

The New York Times ran an article a little while ago (extrapolating from the record 2007 retreat, I think) on this very subject; complete with maps showing that utilizing the NWP cut a significant amount of time/distance off shipping routes from the Far East to Eastern North America: also from Russia to just about everywhere.

Bolstering emergency-response/security/public health capabilities in the Canadian Arctic is a great idea: these new shipping lanes run through/past virtually uninhabited (and often inaccessible) regions way the hell far from anyplace: the more practice the responders get the better.

Uh - - Quinn the Eskimo? (#112886)
by tomsyl

Don't look the song up if you haven't already heard it; otherwise you'll just try to pay me back in a way I don't suspect.

--

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

We'd call it "Operation Speedy Passage" (#112500)
by Zorrito

Jay C wrote:
Geesh - who comes up with these names??

It's Inuit for polar bear. Sounds like a traditional military op name with a dash of PC added. It seems our northern neighbours have yet to descend to infomercial-level military PR.

Nah (#112501)
by HankP

we'd call it "Operation Freedom Passage" or "Operation Arctic Liberty" or some such. You need to work on those PR skills. :)

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Manish (#112460)
by HankP

because I know you love these so much, here's another one. My favorite quote - The earth is NOT TILTED 23.45°degrees....It is UPRIGHT as God created man to walk UPRIGHT.

The section on Einstein is also pretty good, it apparently accepts the theory of luminiferous aether.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Oh great (#112514)
by Elagabalus

Way to kill my belief in the luminiferous aether, HankP!! And on a Monday too! Nice one! Next time how 'bout a **SPOILER ALERT** warning. Sheesh

--

I had discovered a great secret. That everyone loves themselves more than they love anybody else. And if I wanted them to love me, I better be like THEM!... Ken Nordine

Sorry, man (#112597)
by HankP

I guess you shouldn't read this, then. Maybe we can ask PM to look this guy up.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

""SPOILER ALERT** (#112527)
by Jay C

Hey, Hank - should we tell Elagabalus about the phogiston, too?
Or will it upset him, so soon after the luminiferous aether?

I hope (#112533)
by aireachail

that you meant phlogiston.

'cuz if you were trying to say that fogeyston isn't real, my entire retirement plan is kaput.

--

Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. - W. Somerset Maugham

I'm seriously worried (#112476)
by mmghosh

by your ability to ferret these sites out. You're not secretly building these sites for them, are you?

Recent Diaries
Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
The Head Heeb
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary