Both left and right seem to agree about one thing: rich people tend to invest more, and consume proportionally less than middle class or poor people do.

This is the right's argument for tax cuts for the rich: it lets them invest more, and that creates jobs.

It is also the left's argument for various kinds of stimulus spending like unemployment extensions: get the money into the hands of people without money, who have to consume. It is demand that our economy needs now, not supply.

First of all, the ruling is available as a pdf on the Supreme Court's website here. The official title of the case is National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (I'm not linking to the pdf directly because it sometimes causes formatting issues here).

I'm just reading the syllabus for now (the summary at the top of the opinion). Here's what I gather so far...

ANTI-INJUNCTION ACT

Obama's announcement on on changes in the enforcement of immigration laws was welcome if a bit overdue. It would be better to have changes like this made through legislation, but the Republicans have ensured that will never happen as long as Obama (or any Democrat) is President.

In the most expensive race in state history, Scott Walker is favored to keep his job today, but we'll see how it turns out. Democrat recounters are at the ready.